<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER IN EGYPT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/</link>
	<description>People United Means Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscarp</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493833</link>
		<dc:creator>oscarp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493833</guid>
		<description>fredddiebrown, you should start looking up at the sky just in case you see a drone coming to you !!!! lol lol. Things are getting uglier these days and the president doesn&#039;t know whether to follow his teleprompter or his instincts, anyways, both are wrong !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fredddiebrown, you should start looking up at the sky just in case you see a drone coming to you !!!! lol lol. Things are getting uglier these days and the president doesn&#8217;t know whether to follow his teleprompter or his instincts, anyways, both are wrong !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailyPUMA</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493832</link>
		<dc:creator>DailyPUMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493832</guid>
		<description>It would be amazing if leaks weren&#039;t about anything that bad because nothing that bad was going on to hide.  When there is a scandal because those close to the Pope were leaking info, one would hope that there would  be little to leak that is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be amazing if leaks weren&#8217;t about anything that bad because nothing that bad was going on to hide.  When there is a scandal because those close to the Pope were leaking info, one would hope that there would  be little to leak that is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP Boston</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493831</link>
		<dc:creator>HP Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493831</guid>
		<description>Headclunker 06.09.12 at 9:28 am 

One cannot help but think that this is the kind of stuff they should have brought out in 2008 to get McCain in the WH. I just wonder if it took them this long to get themselves organized because they are penguins (penguins can organize well, but not spontaneously or quickly), or they meant for the Dimocrats to take on the GWB mess.
_______________________________________
BINGO!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headclunker 06.09.12 at 9:28 am </p>
<p>One cannot help but think that this is the kind of stuff they should have brought out in 2008 to get McCain in the WH. I just wonder if it took them this long to get themselves organized because they are penguins (penguins can organize well, but not spontaneously or quickly), or they meant for the Dimocrats to take on the GWB mess.<br />
_______________________________________<br />
BINGO!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493830</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493830</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Must read at Hillaryis44:&lt;/b&gt;

June 8th, 2012
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hillaryis44.org/2012/06/08/yup-its-well-past-special-prosecutor-appointment-time/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yup, It&#039;s Well Past Special Prosecutor Appointment Time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Update: WH scrambles on leaks after press conference. Yup, it’s designed to block a special prosecutor. No, it is not a compromise worth accepting. As we write below, get a batch of special prosecutors to scrap the bottom of the corruption as quickly as possible. 

——————————————————————————————

December 10, 2008 we wrote: “A Special Prosecutor is needed right now to investigate the Obama Culture of Corruption.” 


December 11, 2008 we wrote: “The multi-headed Hydra which is the Obama Chicago Culture Of Corruption is growing another head in Washington, D.C. and a special prosecutor is needed in Washington while Patrick Fitzgerald stabs at the Hydra in Chicago.”

Our reasons for bringing forth a special prosecutor are explained in those articles. More reasons have emerged. Now, it’s gotten worse:

“Senate Will Investigate National Security Leaks About Terrorism ‘Kill List’

The Senate will investigate recent national security leaks to the news media in the wake of articles in The New York Times about a “kill list” for terrorists and the use of cyberweapons against Iran, a Senate official said on Tuesday.

Tara Andringa, a spokeswoman for Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the Democratic chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said the committee would hold hearings “pertaining to recent public reports of classified information.”

Ms. Andringa’s comments came after Republican senators John McCain of Arizona and Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, both called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the leaks.

“Such disclosures can only undermine similar ongoing or future operations and, in this sense, compromise national security,” Mr. McCain said on the Senate floor. “For this reason, regardless of how politically useful these leaks may be to the president, they have to stop.” [snip]

Mr. McCain told reporters afterward that he believes the leaks have been designed “to enhance President Obama’s image as a tough guy for the elections.” Mr. McCain is the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee.”
A Senate Armed Services Committee investigation is not sufficient. Criminal charges must behead the politically motivated Obama leakers. A Senate investigation will be hamstrung by Obama Dimocrats up for election themselves, trying to save themselves, country be damned. 

This is Barack Obama’s latest God Damn America moment:

“Most ominously, there are the national-security leaks that are becoming a national scandal—the “avalanche of leaks,” according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, that are somehow and for some reason coming out of the administration. A terrorist “kill list,” reports of U.S. spies infiltrating Al Qaeda in Yemen, stories about Osama bin Laden’s DNA and how America got it, and U.S. involvement in the Stuxnet computer virus, used against Iranian nuclear facilities. These leaks, say the California Democrat, put “American lives in jeopardy,” put “our nation’s security in jeopardy.”

This isn’t the usual—this is something different. A special counsel may be appointed.

And where is the president in all this? On his way to Anna Wintour’s house. He’s busy. He’s running for president.

But why? He could be president now if he wanted to be.“</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Must read at Hillaryis44:</b></p>
<p>June 8th, 2012<br />
<b><a href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2012/06/08/yup-its-well-past-special-prosecutor-appointment-time/" rel="nofollow">Yup, It&#8217;s Well Past Special Prosecutor Appointment Time</a></b></p>
<p>Update: WH scrambles on leaks after press conference. Yup, it’s designed to block a special prosecutor. No, it is not a compromise worth accepting. As we write below, get a batch of special prosecutors to scrap the bottom of the corruption as quickly as possible. </p>
<p>——————————————————————————————</p>
<p>December 10, 2008 we wrote: “A Special Prosecutor is needed right now to investigate the Obama Culture of Corruption.” </p>
<p>December 11, 2008 we wrote: “The multi-headed Hydra which is the Obama Chicago Culture Of Corruption is growing another head in Washington, D.C. and a special prosecutor is needed in Washington while Patrick Fitzgerald stabs at the Hydra in Chicago.”</p>
<p>Our reasons for bringing forth a special prosecutor are explained in those articles. More reasons have emerged. Now, it’s gotten worse:</p>
<p>“Senate Will Investigate National Security Leaks About Terrorism ‘Kill List’</p>
<p>The Senate will investigate recent national security leaks to the news media in the wake of articles in The New York Times about a “kill list” for terrorists and the use of cyberweapons against Iran, a Senate official said on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Tara Andringa, a spokeswoman for Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the Democratic chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said the committee would hold hearings “pertaining to recent public reports of classified information.”</p>
<p>Ms. Andringa’s comments came after Republican senators John McCain of Arizona and Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, both called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the leaks.</p>
<p>“Such disclosures can only undermine similar ongoing or future operations and, in this sense, compromise national security,” Mr. McCain said on the Senate floor. “For this reason, regardless of how politically useful these leaks may be to the president, they have to stop.” [snip]</p>
<p>Mr. McCain told reporters afterward that he believes the leaks have been designed “to enhance President Obama’s image as a tough guy for the elections.” Mr. McCain is the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee.”<br />
A Senate Armed Services Committee investigation is not sufficient. Criminal charges must behead the politically motivated Obama leakers. A Senate investigation will be hamstrung by Obama Dimocrats up for election themselves, trying to save themselves, country be damned. </p>
<p>This is Barack Obama’s latest God Damn America moment:</p>
<p>“Most ominously, there are the national-security leaks that are becoming a national scandal—the “avalanche of leaks,” according to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, that are somehow and for some reason coming out of the administration. A terrorist “kill list,” reports of U.S. spies infiltrating Al Qaeda in Yemen, stories about Osama bin Laden’s DNA and how America got it, and U.S. involvement in the Stuxnet computer virus, used against Iranian nuclear facilities. These leaks, say the California Democrat, put “American lives in jeopardy,” put “our nation’s security in jeopardy.”</p>
<p>This isn’t the usual—this is something different. A special counsel may be appointed.</p>
<p>And where is the president in all this? On his way to Anna Wintour’s house. He’s busy. He’s running for president.</p>
<p>But why? He could be president now if he wanted to be.“</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493825</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493825</guid>
		<description>6
stoney42 06.08.12 at 7:31 pm 
Holder naming prosecters to investigate leaks.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/attorney-general-eric-holder-names-attorneys-to-investigate-leaks/2012/06/08/gJQANhGiOV_story.html
Who trusts Holder? Not me.
----------------
Would he be the same Holder who was threatened with being charged with Contempt because of his reluctance to testify with regard to Fast and Furious? The one who would not follow through on the New Black Panther voter intimidation incidents? 
If so, what&#039;s not to trust?
:roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6<br />
stoney42 06.08.12 at 7:31 pm<br />
Holder naming prosecters to investigate leaks.<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/attorney-general-eric-holder-names-attorneys-to-investigate-leaks/2012/06/08/gJQANhGiOV_story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/attorney-general-eric-holder-names-attorneys-to-investigate-leaks/2012/06/08/gJQANhGiOV_story.html</a><br />
Who trusts Holder? Not me.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Would he be the same Holder who was threatened with being charged with Contempt because of his reluctance to testify with regard to Fast and Furious? The one who would not follow through on the New Black Panther voter intimidation incidents?<br />
If so, what&#8217;s not to trust?<br />
 <img src='http://pumapac.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493824</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493824</guid>
		<description>Re-posting Headclunker&#039;s recent FECK entry here for the casual reader:

211
Headclunker 06.09.12 at 11:21 am 

BO’s last answered the last RFAI was more revisions. Interestingly, the latest RFAI from Ms. Hough does not contain listings of overlimit contributions http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/794/12330007794/12330007794.pdf#navpanes=0

Could it be that the Bobots finally got the message? But there is more.

Statistical analysis of BO 2008 campaign contributions showed that approximately $219 million of BO’s contributions that came from covert source http://www.mur6142.com/images/FEC_1-2-10_Unitemized.doc . While sufficient as supporting grounds for requesting an audit, the analysis itself is not legal evidence of wrongdoing.

Most of our substantial complaints were about the overlimit contributions and foreign donors. The overlimit funds were only about $2 million but they are more significant as an indication of there being a system to launder money. My guestimate is that laundering provided the campaign with another $100 million. To uncover all that, you need to get into the expenses of the campaign. Like with an audit.

We may never see an audit of those 2008 funds, but I sure like how Rebecca is going after them now. We will see.

Hopefully the Bobots will do their revisions before their next monthly reports are due.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-posting Headclunker&#8217;s recent FECK entry here for the casual reader:</p>
<p>211<br />
Headclunker 06.09.12 at 11:21 am </p>
<p>BO’s last answered the last RFAI was more revisions. Interestingly, the latest RFAI from Ms. Hough does not contain listings of overlimit contributions <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/794/12330007794/12330007794.pdf#navpanes=0" rel="nofollow">http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/794/12330007794/12330007794.pdf#navpanes=0</a></p>
<p>Could it be that the Bobots finally got the message? But there is more.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis of BO 2008 campaign contributions showed that approximately $219 million of BO’s contributions that came from covert source <a href="http://www.mur6142.com/images/FEC_1-2-10_Unitemized.doc" rel="nofollow">http://www.mur6142.com/images/FEC_1-2-10_Unitemized.doc</a> . While sufficient as supporting grounds for requesting an audit, the analysis itself is not legal evidence of wrongdoing.</p>
<p>Most of our substantial complaints were about the overlimit contributions and foreign donors. The overlimit funds were only about $2 million but they are more significant as an indication of there being a system to launder money. My guestimate is that laundering provided the campaign with another $100 million. To uncover all that, you need to get into the expenses of the campaign. Like with an audit.</p>
<p>We may never see an audit of those 2008 funds, but I sure like how Rebecca is going after them now. We will see.</p>
<p>Hopefully the Bobots will do their revisions before their next monthly reports are due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493823</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493823</guid>
		<description>Uh oh! Some Dems want Obama to run on his record!!
ACK!

Lanny Davis Goes Off On Obama Aides: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMzdNViW-_I&amp;feature=youtube_gdata_player

H/T NES at UppityWoman&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh! Some Dems want Obama to run on his record!!<br />
ACK!</p>
<p>Lanny Davis Goes Off On Obama Aides: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMzdNViW-_I&#038;feature=youtube_gdata_player" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMzdNViW-_I&#038;feature=youtube_gdata_player</a></p>
<p>H/T NES at UppityWoman&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headclunker</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493822</link>
		<dc:creator>Headclunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493822</guid>
		<description>FECK Update:  http://pumapac.org/forums/feck-obama-team/comment-page-5/#comment-493821</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FECK Update:  <a href="http://pumapac.org/forums/feck-obama-team/comment-page-5/#comment-493821" rel="nofollow">http://pumapac.org/forums/feck-obama-team/comment-page-5/#comment-493821</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prplvette85</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493820</link>
		<dc:creator>prplvette85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493820</guid>
		<description>I saw it on NBC this morning what pissed me off is his arrogance and when I heard him say MY WHITE HOUSE. Well you lying bastard it is not your White House.  It is America&#039;s White House. It is only temporary for you.... poof...be gone....
fucktard. 
Finally, perhaps people will really see him for what he has always been, an master manipulator, and a lying, stealing woman hating thief.. a socialist, unAmerican, pro Russia and China,  Muslim, militant bastard. Go Home...back to Kenya or a slow boat to China... just get out. 

do I sound like a bitter old woman who clings to her guns and religion?  GOOD!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it on NBC this morning what pissed me off is his arrogance and when I heard him say MY WHITE HOUSE. Well you lying bastard it is not your White House.  It is America&#8217;s White House. It is only temporary for you&#8230;. poof&#8230;be gone&#8230;.<br />
fucktard.<br />
Finally, perhaps people will really see him for what he has always been, an master manipulator, and a lying, stealing woman hating thief.. a socialist, unAmerican, pro Russia and China,  Muslim, militant bastard. Go Home&#8230;back to Kenya or a slow boat to China&#8230; just get out. </p>
<p>do I sound like a bitter old woman who clings to her guns and religion?  GOOD!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headclunker</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2012/06/08/denial-is-not-a-river-in-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-493819</link>
		<dc:creator>Headclunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=10267#comment-493819</guid>
		<description>One cannot help but think that this is the kind of stuff they should have brought out in 2008 to get McCain in the WH.  I just wonder if it took them this long to get themselves organized because they are penguins (penguins can organize well, but not spontaneously or quickly), or they meant for the Dimocrats to take on the GWB mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One cannot help but think that this is the kind of stuff they should have brought out in 2008 to get McCain in the WH.  I just wonder if it took them this long to get themselves organized because they are penguins (penguins can organize well, but not spontaneously or quickly), or they meant for the Dimocrats to take on the GWB mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
