Iowa steaks, burgers, pork and all manner of good things carnivorous on the menu tonight, not to mention fresh, organic veggies, cold beer and MOJITOS mixed up by FLBarbara and Dragonfly just for us! Simofish is justly proud of her work in the backyard and has invited all Pumas over to her and the Mrs.’ place tonight. I can personally attest to their gracious and exuberant hospitality, AND the stupendousness of the Mrs.’ cooking, so a good time is sure to be had by all!
Another thing Simo has to be proud and happy about is that as part of her job she is in charge of awarding college scholarships to LGBT high school students. She mentioned it in comments late last night, but I didn’t get a chance to give her a “Hell, yeah Sister” then so, “Hell Yeah, Sister Simofish!”
And, in addition to the scrumptious offerings on the table, here’s some of the other kind of food — food for thought — to chew on tonight as the buzz builds. I was commenting today on THIS intriguing thread over at Cinie’s place and I think we can and should talk more about the many issues Cinie brought up.
I continue to stand by and promote my definition that Feminism is the human experience as lived by women, and that therefore ALL women and girls are feminists — simply by virtue of being born as girls. So my views are borne from that premise. It leads me to very interesting (to me at least LOL!) questions and conundrums, such as:
Imagine if fully 40% of African Americans either didn’t support or were actively and vocally opposed to the Civil Rights Movement? (I’m not talking about the universal Civil Rights Movement, which dances pointed out many African Americans are NOT supportive of (i.e. their support of Prop Hate and their unwillingness to expand the definition of “civil rights” to include lesbians and gay men)).
I’m talking about the classic, old-school anti-racism, full equality and opportunities for black people Civil Rights Movement of Martin Luther King, Malcolm X. and their descendents. What if fully 40% of African-Americans were opposed to THAT Civil Rights Movement?
What would that mean for the Movement? Would it be forced to rethink its premises? Would it be obviously and automatically de-legitimized?
Another thought that I chew on is related to Justice Bader Ginsburg’s view that “There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.’”
How vulnerable is the movement for women’s full political freedom in this country to being divided along economic lines? Will women work to defeat an injustice that only affects poor women, especially if many of those poor women are self-described pro-lifers?
Hmmmm . . . .
LOTS to think about. I need another mojito.
And we ALL need some dancing music for the end of a LOONG week!




{ 305 comments… read them below or add one }
admin 07.10.09 at 9:39 pm
good stuff, as per usual, from BeMindful:
http://thewiddershins.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/hillary-clinton-ready-to-lead-on-day-one/
Rancho 07.10.09 at 9:41 pm
Murphy . . .
)
“got your email and getting ready to read away!”
——————–
Pleeeease, don’t feel obligated. More important things to attend to, I’m sure, (unless you have trouble sleeping and don’t want to use sleeping pills . . . don’t repeat I said that
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 9:52 pm
CNN pollster hides bad numbers for Obama
July 10, 12:20 AM · Marc Rubin –
http://www.examiner.com/x-6572-NY-Obama-Administration-Examiner~y2009m7d10-CNN-pollster-caught-shilling-for-Obama
Cape Hatteras 07.10.09 at 10:07 pm
So this is what they mean when they claim to be ProChoice ?
queasy alert.
http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
Rancho 07.10.09 at 10:13 pm
Got this message when I tried to open Violet Sox, previous thread #190
“”The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later.”
admin 07.10.09 at 10:15 pm
i guess everyone ran over there at once Rancho,
LOL!
hope she ups her resources soon, lots of good stuff there.
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 10:18 pm
Gotta love Greenpeace’s ingenuity. See photo:
http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 10:20 pm
Gotta love Greenpeace’s ingenuity. See photo:
http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/
Photo of obleagh with text:
America Honors Leaders Not Politicians.
Stop Global Warming.
admin 07.10.09 at 10:21 pm
oohh, more food for thought: was it class or race that was the factor in the Philadelphia Pool Incident?
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/mirror-time-how-many-black-kids-are-s
Sunshinelvr 07.10.09 at 10:39 pm
lovely party! whew! finally got all the work done..such heavy lifting to write all those women!
and ftr, Murphy, although I do/did appreciate having a prowl sent via email, I usually check on this blog anyway, so it is of no consequence if I do not get one. I know you must feel swamped at times, so not to worry ’bout me!
Hope all Pumas have a lovely week -end! Where’s pers today?)-miss her remarks. ((hugs))
admin 07.10.09 at 10:40 pm
I’m in a linky mood. via PumaSF:
http://blabbeando.blogspot.com/2009/07/grumble-grumble-and-mea-culpa.html#lgbtsellouts
question, if the name of the gay neighborhood in Chicago is BoysTown, does that mean no lesbians live there?
only partly a sarcastic rhetorical question, the other part is an honest question. Is there a Girls Town in Chicago?
admin 07.10.09 at 10:41 pm
yay Sunshine!!!
Puma-SF 07.10.09 at 10:44 pm
Howdy, Puma friends. It’s been a helluva week and it sounds like I have missed a lot. I am SO glad it’s Friday. I’m starving. What time is dinner?
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 10:46 pm
I will not get started on my invisibility of women issue
I will not get started on my invisibility of women issue
I will not get started on my invisibility of women issue
I will not get started on my invisibility of women issue
I will not get started on my invisibility of women issue
x1000
Puma-SF 07.10.09 at 10:55 pm
Hey Murph,
Here’s another one for ya. I heard about this one on NPR this morning.
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/090710_slain_sailor_funeral
Cinie 07.10.09 at 10:56 pm
Femisex has an interesting article up:
http://www.femisex.com/content/safe-and-legal-abortion-a-blessing-big-media-wont-admit-why-support-abotion-may-be-slipping
Puma-SF 07.10.09 at 10:56 pm
I hope this embeds. Check out this little one. She’s got some awesome moves. Let’s all dance.
Puma-SF 07.10.09 at 10:57 pm
I guess it didn’t work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKx3UU7hwr0
HopePuma 07.10.09 at 11:01 pm
Are we ordering at the party? I think I saw “steaks” on the menu? Mmmm…. I want mine medium rare with a glass of red vino room temperature please.
Here is another link. This one really disturbed me. All those times that we were calling, emailing, faxing, the senators and congresspeople apparently is “secret”. They aren’t telling how many contacts they got from people “for” what they were voting for, and how many were “against”. That means, I guess, that we have no idea how “We the People” stood on an issue that they voted for? That’s a good way of making it look like the majority were in agreement with their vote, even when they weren’t.
Here’s the link:
http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2009/07/10/dennis-moore-exempt-from-foia/
ipotter 07.10.09 at 11:03 pm
If you haven’t seen the photo of bo on the Second Stimulus Package at http://www.drudgereport.com/ , please take a look. Not sure how much longer it will be there, but it’s pretty good. Thank you.
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:07 pm
hiya ipotter!!
Saw that photo earlier… saved it to my harddrive
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:11 pm
ipotter:
“So who was the lady in red who caught the eye of Obama – or should that be O-BUM-a?
Her name is Mayora Tavares, she is 16 and she comes from Brazil.
Mayora was at the G8 summit in Italy as part of the J8 – a group of 53 people aged between 14 and 17 who have been meeting in Rome since the start of the week. The group were there to discuss how the lives of young people around the world can be improved.”
It can start with disgusting old pricks not oogling / sexually objectifying children.
obama and letterman … virtual pedophiles
Social-Psyche 07.10.09 at 11:16 pm
I hobbled back over here as soon as I smelled the organic onions+peppers+tomatos brownin’ nicely on the ‘que.
Just in time for one of those mojitos. FLBarbara, Dragonfly, Barb, Dragonfly. I can’t choose. OK, I’ll have a mojito from both.
That ought to leave me about a half hour before I totally conk out on yaz.
Seriously, I miss you all here at PumaPAC. This is more home than the place I’ve been living in. I’ve been burning the candle at both ends and in the middle. Nothing else but a couple of medical issues kept me away from here. It’s been a crazy couple of months and the story isn’t over.
I did get a bit back in the swing of things by helping some friends test out their brand new blog that they launched tonight. It’s a blog-a-zine for/by women and Puma. I’m personally inviting y’all to be among the first to head over there to revel in their constructive rants. Two are about Feminism. The third is about WordPress. The rest, you can figure out for yourselves– you’re Puma!
**from the announcement now going out**
simofish 07.10.09 at 11:20 pm
Quick drive by as I have company in the side yard — Thanks for the shout out Murphy — BTW – you have mail — a link to my photo’s since you saw the before “look”
Any PUMA is invited to come visit !!!!
OK – back to the BBQ !!
wontbackdown 07.10.09 at 11:21 pm
Murphy, there is a lot of spinning of Ginsburg’s interview spreading across the net, so I thought I would re-post my response-comment here as my opinion.
HEADLINE:
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: I Thought Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations Through Abortion
MY RESPONSE:
“I know that is how her interview is being spun by certain interests. This is the second one attempting to capitalize on that headline.
When I saw the headline of this in an email sent to me yesterday by someone forwarding the same headline from (World Net Daily) and the way it was sensationalized – I immediately went and read the whole article at the NYT.
Read without the “spin,” it is clear that it was not Ginsburg’s “hope” but rather her concern at the time that abortion would be ultimately misused against “poor women and/or undesirables” from reproducing.
GINSBURG STATEMENT WITHOUT THE “SPIN”:
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of,” Ginsburg told Emily Bazelon of the New York Times.
“So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”
THE LIFE SITE NEWS ARTICLE’S “SPIN” ON WHAT GINSBURG SAID:
“Justice Ginsburg’s remarks appear to align her expectations for abortion with those of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and other prominent members of the 20th century’s eugenics movement. Sanger and her eugenicist peers advocated the systematic use of contraception, sterilization, and abortion to reduce the numbers of poor, black, immigrant and disabled populations.”
_______________
REALLY?
Ginsburg as Frau Hitler?
That’s precisely the picture Life Site News article’s commentary on the New York Times attempts to paint.
It just goes to show how easily we can be manipulated by certain kinds of spin in either direction that only serves to derail the ONLY issue at stake which is that of “choice”.
_______________
Sorry to interrupt. Have a nice party.
ipotter 07.10.09 at 11:24 pm
DWP #22
Thanks for the info. What a “leader” we have.
Juliette 07.10.09 at 11:34 pm
Admin #9
I know Huntingdon Valley very well. That is where this pool is, an affluent suburb of Philadelphia. Fron what I gatherd from the sound bite on Fox News, the swimming club seems to be private and someone or orginization bought passed for these young people of color to spend the day at this pool. I could be wrong. The population of Huntingdon Valley includes many Jewish people, there is the Pitcarin estate and Cathedral and well to do people from various ethnic groups. The brief Fox report said that the club director felt that the pool was over crowded and was unsafe considering the amount of life guards on duty.
If the club is in fact private by membership I could understand members being upset that day passes were sold to an excessive amount of visitors. If racial remarks were made I think that is the fault of those who made the remarks and no one else.
I can saw with some certainty that Philadelphia has a number of well run public pools in just about every neighborhood in the city. I don’t really have enough info on this event to have an oppinion yet. I just wish that sexist remarks, especially when directed and young people would result in the same kind of out rage from people as racist remarks.
admin 07.10.09 at 11:36 pm
ipotter!!!!
hey there! long time no see!
admin 07.10.09 at 11:39 pm
just in TIME wbd, my head was just starting to explode when I saw that baloney in my inbox. THANK YOU!!!
ipotter 07.10.09 at 11:40 pm
Hi Murphy, hope you are doing well. Nice bbq.
admin 07.10.09 at 11:42 pm
dances, I got your email and the caption on the image blew my mind. I thought that woman in red was a grown woman, a politician or dignitary of some sort.
PLEASE tell me she is not a 16 year old girl.
please?
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:42 pm
Simo
I love the little tractor / bell thingie.
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:44 pm
admin…
wish I could!
http://www.drudgereport.com/
follow the link
admin 07.10.09 at 11:44 pm
Hope, I think that means we DO know how many people are calling/writing and what they think. We think the pols are SUCKISH to use iCarly’s term and they dont want us to know they know what we think and are ignoring us.
admin 07.10.09 at 11:45 pm
the tractor bell! ZOMG I need one.
the fat buddha on the brick wall is also awesome.
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:46 pm
admin…
wish I could!
Here:
http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/10937/1/
admin 07.10.09 at 11:46 pm
thanks ipotter, i successfully glommed us all on to Simo and the Mrs’ big bbq inauguration party, pretty nifty huh?
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:47 pm
I missed the buddha…brb
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:56 pm
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 11:11 pm
ipotter:
“So who was the lady in red who caught the eye of Obama – or should that be O-BUM-a?
Her name is Mayora Tavares, she is 16 and she comes from Brazil.
Mayora was at the G8 summit in Italy as part of the J8 – a group of 53 people aged between 14 and 17 who have been meeting in Rome since the start of the week. The group were there to discuss how the lives of young people around the world can be improved.”
It can start with disgusting old pricks not oogling / sexually objectifying children.
obama and letterman … virtual pedophiles
Juliette 07.10.09 at 11:57 pm
Cape Hatteras #4
John Holdren, Obama’s science czar says: forcd abortion ans mass sterilization needed to save the planet.
————————————————————–
WOW! Although I am not really that surpriced by the hypocrisy of the radical left, the idea that this is were science is taking us is more than alarming and oh so Obama.
The way my party makes me feel these days can be expressed best by a reference to a scene in the Italian movie “Life is Beautiful” set in W.W.II. facist Italy.
Maria is in attendance at an event she would have perferred to avoid. The oh so educated and sophisticated facists at the party are disgusing how children should be tough about the expense handicap people inflick on the state. The arguement is made under the guise of a mathematics problem recommended for teaching children. At that moment Maria has had enough and crawls under the table like a child to meet her soon to be husband. “Porta mi via” she begs him-”take me away.” He puts her on his horse and they ride off away from the “Ivytard” facists.
The democrats are dead.
Sarah Palin- Porta ci via. Take us away!
“Ivytard”- Thanks Camile Paglia for that one.
admin 07.11.09 at 12:03 am
that’s not what Holdren said. First, it was in an article back in 1973 or so. He was making the point that if the United States was about to collapse due to mass starvation and exponential over=population (remember, in the early 70′s overpopulation was as terrifyingly real to people as global warming is to people today). he was making an observation that if we got to that point, the US government might have a compelling national security interest in controlling population growth by limiting the number of children couples could have.
Certainly he was NOT advocating blanket forced abortions or anything of the sort– he was theorizing.
I dont approve of forced abortions any more than the next person, but what about China? Their country faced imminent collapse without radical population control. These questions/problems are SERIOUS. We cant wave feelings and talking points at them.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 12:05 am
Juliette
I think you’re (and others) setting yourelf up for disappointment. Sarah Palin isn’t anyone’s savior. I know she isn’t mine. The best I can tell you is live the best you can and prepare for the worst.
Make a new plan, Ann. Hope on a bus, Gus. Slip out the back, Jack, and set yourself free.
ipotter 07.11.09 at 12:06 am
It’s not such a bad thing to neuter disgusting old pricks who oogle children though, now is it?
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 12:07 am
ipotter
Not on my planet it isn’t.
ipotter 07.11.09 at 12:09 am
DWP, good
Now I’ll be able to get some sleep. Nite.
Puma-SF 07.11.09 at 12:10 am
Boy howdy, a neuter prowl. Count me in.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 12:11 am
Great seeing you ipotter!!
Sleep well.
::::: pssst. B.e.l.i.z.e.:::::
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:14 am
feminism = the human experience as lived by women, therefore ALL women and girls are feminists
ergo
humanism = the human experience as lived by humans, therefore ALL adults & children are humanists
I would not agree with the above definition of feminism, any more than I’d agree with the above definition of humanism.
~ ~ ~
Regarding the segue from feminism to civil rights to AA’s not supporting civil rights – yes it is all related, but unfortunately fails to address the elephant in the room – conservative Christianity. Do conservative christians of the white persuasion support the civil rights of the conservative christians of the black persuasion? Chew on that one. Do Christians of the conservative persuasion tend to support the civil rights of LGBT? Hardly. Does this sad fact apply to AA conservative christians more so than to white conservative christians? You can answer that one.
The elephant in the room of anti-humanism, anti-feminism, anti-civil-rights and anti-LGBT-rights is the conservatives of religion.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:20 am
Was it class or race that was the factor in the Philadelphia Pool Incident?
Ummm, I don’t know how to figure out a child’s class by looking at a child’s bathing suit.
CJK 07.11.09 at 12:28 am
Don’t know whether this has been posted, but here’s a link to a really interesting article, “Independents Begin to Edge Away from Prez Obama.” Thanks.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24717.html
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:29 am
btw, I read of the Phillie pool incident over at Pam’s House Blend – here’s one of the quotes:
“I heard this lady, she was like, ‘Uh, what are all these black kids doing here?’ She’s like, ‘I’m scared they might do something to my child,’” said camper Dymire Baylor.
Two articles, two different approaches to discussing the same incident.
more here … http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/11943/black-kids-booted-from-whitesonly-pool-at-philly-club
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 12:30 am
MKfromLA in #49:
But the people of the superior classes do. And they teach that prejudice to their children.
The USA is one of the most rigidly stratified societies on the planet.
CJK 07.11.09 at 12:31 am
Another really interesting article:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Juliette 07.11.09 at 12:35 am
Dances #42
Thats Ok, Dances, I am very used to being disappointed by political hopefulls and elected officials. I have mentioned before that I am as prepared as I always am to be disillusioned by Sarah Palin or any other political hopeful, because you just don’t know what problems or positions may arise. Besides that I already have my savior, thank you very much.
Having said that, I think that her views are grounded in common sence and compassion and relatable to the middle class working people who are about to be crushed by Obama’s policies.
Who the hell are these Czars anyway and why do we need so many of them, Did any of them even under go a security check?
Soon we will have more czars than US Senators- all appointed by and to report only to The One.
Here is page 838 from Holdrens book-
” If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility-just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource consumption patterns-providing they are not denied equal protection.”
Equal protection; humm like the kind that Gerald Walpin or the the G.M. bond holders got?
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:37 am
Social-Psyche –
But the people of the superior classes do. And they teach that prejudice to their children.
~~~~
I sure cannot ascertain socio-economic class by the Speedo, but then I was born poor & raised poor. My bad.
~~~
The USA is one of the most rigidly stratified societies on the planet.
Yup. We’re swimming in class-conscious unconsciousness.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 12:41 am
FTR
My original comment:
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 5:11 pm
How’s this for an oxymoron:
Civil Rights Group Divided Over Gay Marriage
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
LOS ANGELES — The Southern Christian Leadership Conference — the 50-year-old civil rights organization founded by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others — is seeking to remove the president of its Los Angeles chapter in response to his support of same-sex marriage in California.
The effort by the Atlanta-based organization is meeting stiff resistance in Los Angeles from both the board of the local chapter, whose chairman is secretary of the state Democratic Party, and the City Council president.
During the battle last fall over Proposition 8, an amendment to the State Constitution that banned same-sex marriage, the chapter’s president, the Rev. Eric P. Lee, was more than a tangential figure for the opposition. He was front and center at an opposition group’s large rally at City Hall and marched in the blazing sun for 15 miles in Fresno. Many other local African-American pastors prepared mailings featuring church leaders in support of the proposition and linking their views to President Obama, then the Democratic nominee for president.
Mr. Lee “was very helpful to us,” said Rick Jacobs, head of the Courage Campaign, a left-leaning political action group in Los Angeles that fought to the initiative.”
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:48 am
sounds like southern christians of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference have more in common with Mormons than they have in common with west-coast members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Juliette 07.11.09 at 12:49 am
admin #41
How do you feel about the way China dealt with its population explosition. It didn’t seem to work out so well for baby girls.
murphy 07.11.09 at 12:53 am
no it didnt Juliette, and I feel terrible about it, enraged even. But that doesnt change the fact that China faced a serious threat to its survival due to overpopulation. I dont believe eliminating or drastically reducing the number of girls in their country was a GOAL of the child-limit laws, though it was a horrible side effect. what to do??
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 12:54 am
Murphy #9 Sounds like you’ve decided it was class? Why? Are black kids assumed to be poor? But the cause remains ambiguous even though the article was fact-free on those counts.
oohh, more food for thought: was it class or race that was the factor in the Philadelphia Pool Incident?
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/mirror-time-how-many-black-kids-are-s
No ambiguity in the thread about (old story) how Blacks evidently don’t care about the civil or human rights of others (LGBT) Big assumption but I don’t know if you’re attributing the outcome to race hate or homophobia.
Since the civil rights group’s name is The Southern Christian Leadership Conference the words Southern and Christian should jump out right away to suggest a certain bias religion). But right now all all women are feminists even if they’re anti-feminists. I don’t get the parallel.
Did you check out what the white southern Christians across the US voted on marriage equality? Seems to me white southern Christians have been against most civil rights for most people, thus the 200 year struggle for human rights.
______________________________
I don’t think Ginsburg was talking about population control in countries like China and India. She’s talking about the eugenics movement related to racist and classist social Darwinism beginning at the end of the 19th c. and the desire to limit births of “undesirables”. I’ve been working on a post about that for a bout a week and I’m almost finished. As a Jew she would be more cognizant than most about this historical issue.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 12:56 am
Juliette -
Wouldn’t you agree then that if the USA and China are skeered of overpopulation, then a perfectly logical consequence should be to give tax breaks and high esteem to LGBT? Certainly we are not all childless, but we are often childless. But instead of tax breaks, we LGBT get exactly the opposite in this country. Why is that?
murphy 07.11.09 at 12:57 am
why limit it to southern christians? plenty of Californian Christians in the SCLP supported Prop Hate (as did the majority of mostly white Mormons, as you pointed out)
agree 1000% with you MK about the danger to democracy of ANY brand of fundamentalist religion that aims to change laws to conform with their theology, including especially fundamentalist Christianity, which is a more clear and present threat in the US. Muslims, though more uniformly radical and fundamentalist than average Christians, are a very small minority in our country and therefore pose a less treasonous and existential threat to our democracy than fundamentalist christians.
scarlet 07.11.09 at 1:03 am
I read Cinie’s blog via Murphy’s link above and then went searching for info on Phyllis Schlafly. Oh, oh, here is what I found:
The Feminists Demand and Receive
by Phyllis Schlafly
July 7, 2009
President Obama has repeatedly expressed his concern about our rising unemployment. The worst losses of jobs are in manufacturing, because building autos has gone overseas, and in construction, because the housing industry has tanked.
When Obama announced his stimulus appropriation, he promised millions of “shovel-ready” jobs. Many people worried about increasing the national debt to create government jobs, but his proposal was attractive because it conjured up visions of crews in hard hats repairing our nation’s infrastructure, roads, bridges and electrical grids, and building long-needed highways and schools.
We were told that the purpose of this extraordinary deficit spending in the stimulus package was to jolt the economy. We expected the money to be concentrated on the areas that have suffered the steepest decline during this recession, such as the auto industry and housing construction.
But the feminists then demonstrated the death grip they hold over Obama and the leaders of the Democratic Party. The feminists swung into action with noisy accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men.
A member of Pelosi’s staff dared to offer the suggestion that “apron ready” could be the female equivalent of the term “shovel ready.” The feminists didn’t think that was funny.
http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2009/07/07/the_feminists_demand_and_receive
http://www.now.org/news/note/030609.html
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:04 am
oh gosh no PumaBear, I have NOT decided it was class. I was intrigued by the author’s post that I linked to. the case looks like a muddled mess of LOTS of factors, from the reasonable to the snobby to the outright racist.
MK, of course children in bathing suits aren’t identifiably members of any particular class. But when a busload of children from a city day camp shows up at a private pool in the suburbs, and the members of the private club know or learn that their club has contracted with city day camps to make some money by selling day passes to the day camps, it would be crazy for the members to not conclude that the kids are from poorer neighnorhoods — “Fresh Air for City Kids” type of thing.
white kids from the South Boston neighborhood would be instantly recognizable as “poor city kids” in a place like that too.
but no, I havent decided it’s a class thing — I’m wondering how much of it IS a class thing, that’s all.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:10 am
Murphy#62,
plenty of Californian Christians in the SCLP supported Prop Hate
__________________________________________
I doubt the name of the organization is about the current residents of the voters. The name refers to the belief system eg. Southern Baptists v. Northern Baptists, African Methodists v. Southern Methodists, etc. These groups often hold more liberal v. more conservative religious views. Southern anything is much more conservative and interprets the Bible as the unadulterated word of god. Maybe there is a parallel between Orthodox Jews and Reform Judaism. How many orthodox and ultra orthodox Jews support marriage equality. Why don’t you single them out?
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:12 am
social-psyche, “the US is one of the most rigidly stratified societies on the planet.”
more rigidly stratified than China? India? Japan, Korea, and Indonesia/malasia, and the Middle East?
those countries comprise 2/3rds of the world’s population and are WAAY more stratified than we are. in practice and even in law.
The United States is also one of the most ethnically, racially, and religously diverse countries on Earth too. It’s not a surprise to me that we struggle and debate with ourselves about integration, diversity, equal opportunities etc.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:15 am
Murphy – I limited my remark to southern Christians because the name of the group “Southern Christian Leadership Conference”.
My point is … Count the number of comments blaming AAs for prop hate & the number of comments blaming AA’s for voting for Obama. The first fact conveniently ignores the religion of so many AAs – so was it genetics or religion to blame for prop hate? The second fact conveniently ignores the size of the AA population compared to all other ethnicities who voted for Obama, as well as the defection of so many other voting blocks.
What these two sets of common comments have in common is rage against AAs. Frankly, I believe that a great deal of that rage is transferred. And it is dangerous.
The threat from fundamentalism is significant, and the topic is a large one.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:19 am
Scarlet #63,
When Obama announced his stimulus appropriation, he promised millions of “shovel-ready” jobs. Many people worried about increasing the national debt to create government jobs, but his proposal was attractive because it conjured up visions of crews in hard hats repairing our nation’s infrastructure, roads, bridges and electrical grids, and building long-needed highways and schools.
A member of Pelosi’s staff dared to offer the suggestion that “apron ready” could be the female equivalent of the term “shovel ready.” The feminists didn’t think that was funny.
and…
A member of Pelosi’s staff dared to offer the suggestion that “apron ready” could be the female equivalent of the term “shovel ready.” The feminists didn’t think that was funny.
___________________________
I don’t know if these comments make more fun of Obama and Pelosi. I think Schlafly is as ridiculous and dangerous as the other two.
re: “apron ready”. If that quote comes from the Schlafly camp I would question it’s validity and context before I believed Pelosi said that. Pelosi has been no friend of Democratic women but Schlafly is a potent and permanent enemy.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 1:20 am
Speaking of LGBT rights and the Mormon’s… Just caught this article….
Gay couple detained and cited for tresspass and inappropriate behavior (hug and Kiss) near Morman Plaza….
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,531581,00.html?test=latestnews
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:20 am
i DO single them out PumaBear. I often say that religous fundamentalism of any type, practiced by any race, is a threat to democracy. I recently singled out Orthodox Jews for their attempts to bypass the American judicial system in order to impose their medieval judicial misogyny.
I may have been misinterpreting MK’s comment, but when she said that “sounds like southern christians of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference have more in common with Mormons than they have in common with west-coast members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference” I thought she was differentiating between “west-coast Christians” in the SCLC and “southern Christians” in the SCLC by saying that southern christians are more like Mormons that west-coast christians are.
and I think plenty of black Christians in California voted for Prop Hate alongside white Christians and Mormons. So I fail to see how west-coast Christians can be favorably compared to Southern Christians.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:26 am
MK #67, I think it’s unfair to give black Christians a pass for bigotry because their “religion made them do it.” I certainly dont give white, asian, or hispanic christians (or jews or muslims) a pass for being bigots and treasonous unAmericans because their religion tells them that “god hates fags” or that marriage is sanctified by god as between one man and one woman and therefore the laws of the United States should respect God’s law.
why do you seem to justify black christian homophobia on the grounds of their religious beliefs? Homophobia, bigotry, sexism is abhorrent to me no matter WHERE of from whom it comes.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:28 am
Murphy – no, I havent decided it’s a class thing — I’m wondering how much of it IS a class thing, that’s all.
I try on various scenarios in my mind: A bunch of wealthy Nigerians show up in super-duper Speedos (whatever that looks like). Okay, swap the wealthy Nigerians for wealthy Swiss. A bunch of poor Moroccan kids show up in crappy Speedos. Okay, swap the poor Moroccans for poor Albanians.
It’s funny – in Europe they often look at your shoes to get a fix on your class. Here they look at your skin.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 1:32 am
What to do Murphy, I think is leave it to the people not the government. I agree, at least hope that reducing the number of female population in China was not the goal of the Chinese govenment but it was the result. I am sure we could find many reasons for the problems China was having during their time of over population. They were a very closed society, we don’t really know what other factors were involved, but I believe in the common sense of people over the government any day.
In the most Catholic nations of Europe you will find the lowest birth rates. People realize when they can’t afford to have any more children, in societies were the quality of life is better than in places like China. People want a certain life style for their children so they limit the numbers of children they have without any govenment involvement. The problems with disregaurd for quality of life and limiting family size seems to exist more where people are fully dependent on the govenment, as in welfare populations in America and the major population of China. I think given their own sense of free will and dignity to work and be self sufficient, people wind up being more responsible about alot of things, including the size of their family.
In any case the US is not communist China.
We are supposed to be represented by elected officials not controled by czars.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:34 am
oh, and another important aspect to this issue is the question of hypocrisy. It is certainly a valid question to ask why so many prominent black members of the Civil Rights movement have a “equality for me but not for thee” attitude.
When white patriarchal religious types espouse patriarchal heteronormative bigotry, sexism, or misogyny it is repellent, but not surprising. It IS a curious and important question to ask why some of the actual children of Martin Luther King judge their sister and fellow Americans on the color of their sexuality rather than the content of their character.
Feminism is continuously expected to include anti-racism, anti-class-elitism, and anti-homophobia in its agenda. And it tries damn hard to do just that.
Imagine if prominent or large swaths of self-identified feminists campaigned for Prop Hate. It would be seriously important news.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:35 am
Murphy #70,
West coast Christians are Southern Baptists. It has nothing to do with the fact that they live in California or the West Coast. They are Southern Baptists. Very conservative. So if that’s not evident to you, why constantly harp on race? Southerners are social conservatives, even the Black ones due to the pervasive system of acculturating blacks to Christianity as a way of encouraging obedience. Just because they have moved to California doesn’t mean their belief systems have changed. Likewise, orthodox Jews come here from Israel, do they’re ideas about same sex marriage change? I get the feeling there’s a denial about the variety and complexity in the way the so-called Black race reacts to things, how they act, feel, how rich or poor or cultivated they are. They seem to be a big ol’ resented monolith.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 1:36 am
Here, I’m editing the original comment I posted to the oxymoron part only, because the title is what struck me:
My original comment:
DancesWithPumas 07.10.09 at 5:11 pm
How’s this for an oxymoron:
Civil Rights Group Divided Over Gay Marriage
Goodnight. Sleep well.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:36 am
Murphy #71 –
I agree with you also 1000% – that no one gets a pass on homophobia.
My problem is the implicit racism embedded in the framing of comments.
How many commenters point out the skin color of mormons who are homophobic?
How many commenters point out the religious bias of many AAs?
kat in your hat 07.11.09 at 1:37 am
Hello Puma cuties.
I’m stopping by to show my support (in light of recent blah) and also state that I am one of those crazy womyn folk who will always vote for women when they are an option, no matter what. I’m only here on this planet for a handful of decades. I want more women in office. Only way there will be more women in office is if they are voted in. I can vote. That’s the answer. Capiche. We do not have the luxury of weighing candidates so critically…’cause there aren’t that many to begin with and we’ll all be DEAD in a few decades. get IT? I support women. I vote for women. All the others who think they can pick and choose don’t get Mortality. Sorry.
We.are.not.going.to.live.that.much.longer.on.the.grand.scale.
You want it now or never?
You want it in your lifetime or not?
Just my 2 cents.
Anyway, glad I could sneak in here while most are comfy and sleepin’. Just wanted to show my support and say hello. Will be stopping by more, now that I have a *working* computer! LOL. xo
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:39 am
as a poor white kid growing up, like you MK, i know for a fact that people looked at our shoes, our clothes, our cars, our last names, our accents, our teeth, and every other thing to determine if we were rich or poor, acceptable or not.
I’m not denying the stereotyping people do toward black people or that black kids are often automatically assumed to be poor or “trouble” when they dare to venture out of the city.
but poor white kids can also be spotted a mile away.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:40 am
kat in your freaking hat!
SOO awesome to see you girl. love your tweets, think of you often. you make my day!
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:40 am
goofsmom #69
Thank you for the link to the Mormons/LGBT article. As you can see, no mention of the race of the Mormon staff nor of the 2 gay men.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 1:43 am
Murphy in #66:
Population count is another factor, sa is diversity. High counts of either/both will hardly mean lower stratification by class.
Among the nations you named, India, China and Indonesia are highly diverse, Japan and Korea less so. The nation you omitted is the one I named as among the most stratified: yes, it’s the USA, and it is high in both population and diversity.
I hadn’t seen world population figures in a long time so I wasn’t sure what the top 10 were but I was fairly sure about the top 5. Here are the top 5 acc’g to one list:
China
India
United States
Indonesia
Brazil
Brasil also is high in diversity, but there again, those two factors don’t negate the fact that it’s rigidly stratified by class– just like the United States.
The top 5 share this dubious distinction.
And yes, all 5 struggle with some overlapping problems. In the USA, we’re not so very different after all, albeit in a way more negative than we wish to accept.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:44 am
not a big old resented monolith by me PumaBear. I’m not harping on it, though I may have misinterpreted MK’s comment like I said. sounded a bit like treating Southerners as a big ol’ resented monolith.
are you saying that black christian homophobia in California is the fault of white Southerners?
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:46 am
Murphy,#74
When white patriarchal religious types espouse patriarchal heteronormative bigotry, sexism, or misogyny it is repellent, but not surprising.
______________
Why isn’t it surprising? White conservatives and Christians also espouse a doctrine of equality, freedom, justice, god-fearing and trembling at the wrath of sin. Somebody once said about the slave holding American rebels “nobody wails more about the unfairness of taxes and how it has reduced them to slavery than the slaver driving his slaves to market”. Not a direct quote but you get the message.
America is full of contradictions. The promise of the constitution required untold bloodshed endless battles, misery and slowly won human rights. The battle is never won.
There ARE 50% of feminists who oppose women’s rights. They’re called anti-feminists, conservative, religious, comfortable women and flag huggers. Only on this blog could anti-feminists be called feminists much as segregationist might be called integrationists and yet hold to the same segregationist views.
Cinie 07.11.09 at 1:46 am
I think a lot of the rise of the conservative African American position is tied to the seduction of the Bush instituted “faith-based initiatives” which gave funding to them over more liberal and moderate groups. The long-standing (and wrong-headed, imo) tradition of seeking out religious leaders in the black community as political ones, was turned on its head, with “leaders” whose positions were 180 degrees opposite to those of old-school Civil Rights activists were given undue prominence. Thus, people like MLK’s daughter, Rev. Bernice was actively campaigning against positions long held by her mother and father and their contemporaries. Since they (black clergymen/women)were always considered voices of all blacks, whatever crap they’re spouting is presented as representative, whether it is, or not.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:47 am
Kat in your Hat, it is very very nice to see you again.
And I am on the other side of your argument. That said, it is still very nice to see you again.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:50 am
arent ALL mormons white?
I thought Mormon was practically a synonym for white. lol!
thanks social-psyche for the facts.
I’m really NOT trying to make any “I’m right and you’re wrong” type arguments, though I think it’s true that 2/3 of the world’s population live in HIGHLY stratified cultures and that the US is waay less stratified than say India or Indonesia or Saudi Arabia or Dubai.
but absolutely positively we are stratified by money and education, no question and it’s another mortal threat to democracy. it’s also getting WORSE with the Bush-Obama economic policies and priorities.
scarlet 07.11.09 at 1:51 am
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:19 am
re: “apron ready”. If that quote comes from the Schlafly camp I would question it’s validity and context before I believed Pelosi said that. Pelosi has been no friend of Democratic women but Schlafly is a potent and permanent enemy.
————–
The validity and context of “apron ready” is on the NOW link I posted on 63.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:51 am
and nice to see you too Cinie (though I saw your earlier today but I haven’t seen Kat in your hat in like ages & ages)
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:53 am
fundamentalist christians dont espouse freedom or equality Pumabear. they espouse submission to God and strict adherence to his will as set forth in the Bible.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 1:54 am
(((((KatinyourHat))))))
I have missed you and look forward to seeing you more on the blog….
(((((MKfromLA))))))
You are welcome…
((((((Nighty-night and sweet dreams PUMAS)))))))
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:54 am
oh scarlet, glad you’re still here. LINK QUEEN of the YEAR award to you again.
how many times can we induct you into the Puma Hall of Fame for Links and Citations and Resources? It must be pretty lonely in there with just you and MK!
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:56 am
cinie #85, that makes a lot of sense to me. yup. gawd faith-based initiatives are effing more horrible than we even knew.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:58 am
or in the Koran or in the Old Testament/Talmud.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:58 am
Murphy – arent ALL mormons white?
I’ve never actually met a non-white Mormon. When I go the the Mormon Temple’s genealogy library here in LA, there’s nothing but thin-lipped white folks there.
But I heard a rumor that the Mormons finally decided that black men are allowed to be “priests”. Which makes me think there must be at least one non-white Mormon out there somewhere. Maybe several.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 1:59 am
back atcha (((((((((goofsmam))))))))))
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 1:59 am
Murphy #71,
MK #67, I think it’s unfair to give black Christians a pass for bigotry because their “religion made them do it.” I certainly dont
give white, asian, or hispanic christians (or jews or muslims) a pass for being bigots and treasonous unAmericans
_________________________
The difference in your comparisons between groups is that you blame bigotry of AA’s on race. You blame the bigotry of the other groups on religion. Why is that?
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 2:00 am
Simple Minded Me Says:
Whether it’s Race, Religion, Sexual Orientation or Class, we wave the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Civil and Equal Rights Amendments
like the flags of one of the most equality-oriented societies in the world.
…Didn’t those documents assume, however, that our society would actually come to a “consensus” that equality and human rights were to be the foundation rather than an “ideal”?
…Few, if any, denominations can conceive of “Human Rights” without them, in whole or in part, somehow being based upon “Biblical Principles” and that is the whole problem, as we all know.
…The Human Rights issue is a religious battle, pure and simple, which the Constitution attempted to avoid.
…Unfortunately, the “One Nation Under God” masquerades as THE “consensus” for following Biblical rather than Constitutional Law.
The problem isn’t that 99% of ALL Christians believe that’s the way it should be – the problem is that they LIE about their belief in Separation of Church State in order to protect their position as the exception to the rule.
Just like most of us lie, in one way or another, about “class” issues…
I think.
Cinie 07.11.09 at 2:03 am
Hey MK, how ya doin’?
Gladys Knight is a Mormon, F everybody’s I. That doesn’t mean there’s a buncha other black Mormons though, after all, Sammy Davis was Jewish, and most blacks aren’t Jewish, and most Jewish people ain’t black.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_Knight
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:03 am
Murphy,
Hispanics are not a monolith. I think there is a difference between Hispanic pentecostals and catholics in the way they address marriage equality. They don’t oppose ME because they are Hispanic, per se.
Why do you give a pass to anti-feminists because they are female? Sounds like the same kind of hypocrisy.
kat in your hat 07.11.09 at 2:04 am
murphy and MKfromLA & goofsmom xo. I have only been able to read murphy’s posts these few months, but not 90% of comments on blog threads. Thread rarely opened. Bonkers computer. Very frustrating. I couldn’t read Uppity Woman all this time either. (Or watch half of the videos on youtube, etc) My old computer went haywire and then I had this extreme anti-virus parental control thing installed and it got stuck. Stuck. I couldn’t read anything about “women; sexism; homosexuality,” etc) all “ADULT”–lol. yeah, I started meditating. Helped me to not freak. I have new laptop now though.
Me go sleepies. I’ll be in and out. here and there. xoxox gnight puma cuties. Still got your back. No Doubt. muah!
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:05 am
ps Murphy -
I was the one drawing the distinction between southern christians, west coast christians, members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, etc. Because the article that DWP posted mentions the west coast guy who supported marriage equality.
That’s why I mentioned west coast versus the SCLC HQ.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 2:05 am
MkfromLA in #81:
re. the Mormon/LGBT article
“As you can see, no mention of the race of the Mormon staff nor of the 2 gay men.”
I’m with you on the race of the 2 gay men.
MK, it’s due to the same old habit of mentioning race when black, but omitting it when white.
Perhaps the omission of race among the Mormons inadvertently highlights a cold reality about that sect’s leaders. It was relatively recently IIRC when the church fathers allowed AA males to attain higher rank in that church. AA women then have the thrill of being ruled over by males of the tinge we may call the Privilege of False Superiority. It tinges everything grey for women.
Not too surprising that being Mormon is tantamount to being white. The Mormons created that presumption of white maleness.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:06 am
Cinie,
Glady’s Knight is a Mormon? That makes me feel suicidal. Is that a joke?
Does that mean she maybe voted against ME because she is a Mormon?
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:07 am
Cinie!!!! Gladys Knight is a Mormon???? I am … crushed. If I ever do go to Georgia, I’m taking the next midnight train right back out again.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:08 am
mk #95, lol! i was JOKING about there being no black mormons. but mormons have a long and explicit history of racism, no?
mk #102, yup i got that, was attempting to say that I might have misinterpreted what you were saying.
scarlet 07.11.09 at 2:09 am
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:54 am
oh scarlet, glad you’re still her
==========
I am usually up until after two, but in the bedroom with a book or the tv on. For the next three months, my very favorite tv show, Big Brother, is on from 11pm to 2am every night on Showtime and I get that from Direct TV and that TV is in my office where the computer is. So, I will probably be participating more at night with my links and learning a lot more from others.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:10 am
(((goofs))),
Are you armed with hugs and ready to do battle?
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 2:10 am
Cinie… What a bomb to drop… now I’m wide awake (at least for a few)
I checked the link… OMFG… Gladys Knight is a Mormon… a mormon… I can’t get over that…
WOW
Cinie 07.11.09 at 2:12 am
Sorry guys, it’s common knowledge here in Vegas. In fact, if you Google “Gladys Knight Mormon,” you get lots of hits.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:13 am
WBD,
Good points.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:14 am
Cinie, I guess they like getting 10% of her checks even if she IS a black female.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 2:15 am
Murphy in #88:
Neither one of us is going to be…
* moving to Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Indonesia any time soon, and that’s the short list, ain’t it (OK, there’s Mauritania, Uzbekistan, Brunei, Bahrain, Burkina Faso)
* joining the Mormons, the Muslims, or the Mennonites
* comdoning hateful speech and action against our sister and fellow American citizens
Au contraire.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:19 am
wontbackdown #98
wow lots of thought-provoking comments all packed into one! Worthy of a whole thread if you ask me.
my 2 cents (until we get that whole thread) …
The Human Rights issue is a religious battle I think it’s an ethical battle. I can only dream that religious questions were based on ethics. Sigh.
And the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Civil and Equal Rights Amendments are exist because we Americans have demonstrated our need for their protections against other Americans.
The problem isn’t that 99% of ALL Christians believe that’s the way it should be – the problem is that they LIE about their belief in Separation of Church State in order to protect their position as the exception to the rule.
Yup. Yup Yup.
Confession – when I saw the copy of the Bill of Rights in DC, I cried. That’s my religion.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:19 am
puma bear, you accuse me of “blam[ing] bigotry of AA’s on race. You blame the bigotry of the other groups on religion. Why is that?”
not at all. I blame the bigotry of those AA’s who are bigoted homophobes on BIGOTRY and HOMOPHOBIA not on race. I simply object to giving AA’s a PASS for bigotry and homophobia based on RELIGION. Race has nothing to do with it for me.
Other than, like I said, I find it hypocritical of a group (and I mean the subset of AA civil rights proponents who are homophobes and bigots NOT the entire AA race or the entire civil rights movement) who fights for civil rights for themselves but not only doesnt include cvil rights for LGBT in their agenda but actively works AGAINST the civil rights efforts of the LGBT community and its supporters.
I most emphatically do NOT “blame the bigotry of other groups [like hispanics or white mormons or irish-american catholics] on their religion.” I blame it on THEIR BIGOTRY and HOMOPHOBIA. Many many many black white asian hispanic middle eastern south american Christians, Jews, and probably even some Muslims are able to practice and love their religions without being bigots or homophobes and without trying to impose their bigoted and homophobic views on our Constitution.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 2:23 am
(((PUMAbear)))
I’m armed with bunches and bunches of hugs and more than ready to do battle…
I did some more searching on Gladys Knight… She converted in 1998 after one of her sons did… She now has a 100 member Mormon gospel group… I am so sad and blown away…
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:25 am
Social-psyche #103 … AA women then have the thrill of being ruled over by males Too funny.
Murphy #106 … yeah, I knew you were kidding. Just having a little fun.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:26 am
Murphy
fundamentalist christians dont espouse freedom or equality Pumabear. they espouse submission to God and strict adherence to his will as set forth in the Bible.
___________________________
Don’t think so Murphy. Fundamentalist white christians such as Fallwell, Swaggart, Taggert, Dobson, conflate christianity with patriotism, freedom, moral and sexual virtue, good husbandry practices, low taxes, receiving wealth due to all of the above.
America is the new Israel, bow down to god, the forefathers are god-fearing christians.
Yes, they are religious bigots but they also claim a particular affinity with democracy, freedom, rule of law.
No one cries out more that he is a slave for having to pay taxes to the king than the slaver driving his Negroes to the slave market.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:27 am
“Why do you give a pass to anti-feminists because they are female? Sounds like the same kind of hypocrisy.”
I’m really not sure I have a clear enough definition for “anti-feminists” that I can use to confidently judge or condemn other women.
I certainly have working definitions of racism and homophibia that I can use to judge racist or homophobic women, and they get no pass from me for being homophobes or racists simply because they are women.
but anti-feminist women? not there yet. so therefore i can’t say whether I give them a pass for being women.
but,yup my working model, until I better understand/define feminism and womanhood is to include ALL women in my circle of feminism.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:28 am
they can conflate it all they want PumaBEAR. doesnt make it so.
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 2:31 am
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:19 am
Good points. Yes, The Bill of Rights is an Amazing document! I have never seen it in DC but I’ve re-read it this past year, several times, with both awe and sadness and can only imagine the experience of seeing the original.
Yes, “ethical systems” (per Joseph Campbell) vs. “divine dogmas” (per religious zealots)
____________________
I need some Popcorn, MMs and a Coke.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 2:37 am
Murphy,
You emphatically DID blame the bigotry against LGBT on their being Black not on their being Christians or individual bigots. You did not acknowledge that there is a difference between factions of a religion. Why blame individuals on this issue when you blame Islam for everything that goes wrong in ME society?
It’s the nature of religion to impose itself on others, it’s revealed truth and they’re doing everyone a favor. The constitution is a step or two down from the Bible, Koran, Talmud.
If everyone is an individual personally to blame why do we have these brainwashed religious groups acting as cohorts against a common purpose?
They’re not solo individuals who just happened to find each other. This is their faith and ideation. You believe in a system that you’re raised in. You don’t go questioning everything like your a philosopher.
Cinie 07.11.09 at 2:37 am
The history of black Mormons I read a bit of it, then compared what I read with some other sites so, even though I can’t vouch for the info, it seems like a good jumping off point.
http://www.angelfire.com/mo2/blackmormon/homepage.html
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:40 am
WBD ….
I love love loved Joseph Campbell.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 2:43 am
Nobody mentioned dessert, except WBD’s taste for some M&Ms. What, you thought M&MS were vegetables, because of the colours?
I want some toasted marshmallows. Well, I don’t really want to eat them. I just want to hold them over the remaining charcoals and catch that aroma.
Anybody know where the kebab skewers are? I’d roast the marshmallows on sticks, campfire style, but Obama took the last twigs I had gathered to rebuild my hut.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:45 am
Cinie – thanks for that link to Mormons & the Curse of Cain legacy. I am getting too tired to read it now, but I will take a look tmw.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:46 am
Social-Psyche
Obama took the last twigs I had gathered to rebuild my hut
tooooo funny.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 2:47 am
Possible reason for few blacks in Mormon Church
As I remember, one of Joe Smith’s prophesies was that God punished the decendents of Cain by making them black.
I looked into it, herre’s what I found.
http://www.mrm.org/curse-of-cain
Surprisingly though there are black Mormons other than Gladys Knight.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:55 am
nope, I didnt and I dont PumaBEAR. I only blame the hypocrisy of SOME aa’s for being pro-civil-rights for the aa community but against civil rights for the lgbt community. I dont blame their bigotry on their race, that would be stupid. People of ALL races can be bigots and homophobes. People of all races and both genders can be hypocrites too, obviously. I merely object to being accused of racism for pointing out what is an obvious hypocrisy on the part of SOME aa civil rights proponents.
and honestly, that hypocrisy is really not that big of an issue to me — it’s like the hypocrisy of Rebublicans who support corporate welfare but oppose aid for poor single mothers. or the hypocrisy of fundamentalist christians who scream about sharia but vote for Prop Hate. It’s real, it’s common, and it happens in ALL communities and by all races and both genders.
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 2:57 am
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 2:43 am:
What, you thought M&MS were vegetables, because of the colours?
Of course! What do you expect from one who changes the decor by spray painting all of the furniture – in avocado green – and refinishing the hardwoods by rolling them in water-based, flat brown – “oops” paint.
murphy 07.11.09 at 2:59 am
of COURSE I acknowledged that there are factions to religions. I constantly use the qualifier “fundamentalist” to differentiate the majority of Christians and Jews from the minority of fundamentalists who try to impose their religious beliefs on our democracy.
FLBarbara 07.11.09 at 3:00 am
Oh crap I missed a party hope someone tendered to your drinks
Simo and mrs wishing you love and happiness with your new BBque will now read about the party I missed.
Was caspers music good? Yeah LimboV CongoV
Juliette 07.11.09 at 3:01 am
Has everybody signed the petition to reinstate Gerald Walpin.
CJK posted the link yesterday.
I want a Gerald Walpin for president bumper sticker.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 3:02 am
Murphy,
who called you a racist? I just said I thought your logic was not following when calling Blacks homophobic but refusing to call women anti-feminist. Feminism has a different meanings for different people. Pick any one of them and there will still be anti-feminists by that definition.
I’m pointing out the possible reason that some AA’s justify homophobia. Same reason some white’s justify homophobia: religion.
None of that has much to do with race. Usually homophobia isn’t race based. Racism is race based.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:06 am
WBD in #130:
I am intrigued by the colours.
Does this mean you wanna roast the mini marshmallows in delicious shades of green, yellow, and pink?
(Ya’d think they’d have vacuum-dried pre-roasted marshmallows by now. Add water and toss ‘em into the microwave.)
Btw WBD, if your furniture is avocado green, then what colour is your refigerator? Harvest gold or autumn orange?
Now seriously, tell me you didn’t paint the hardwood!
Have you been watching HGTV?
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 3:08 am
I appreciate the civilized discussion. Gotta call it a night, though.
ciao
murphy 07.11.09 at 3:10 am
oh, I thought you were accusing me of singling out RACE as the cause of bigotry for those AA’s who support Prop Hate. In my book, ascribing the cause of negative, immoral, or illogical behavior to a person’s race is RACIST.
perhaps I misunderstood you.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 3:14 am
Murphy, anyone can be a hypocrite, even feminists and anti-feminists. So repeating endlessly the mantra that blacks voted against LGBT because they are homophobes and hypocrites on civil rights seems odd. On the other hand you say you can’t define anti-feminism thereby giving a pass to the enemies of feminism, femophobes, who would deny us equal rights in the same way as some would deny LGBT rights. Sure AAs are hypocritical but no more so than christians of other races. If the problem is “they got theirs” plenty of whites, Mormons have had “theirs” for some time now,too. It took hundreds of years to half ass gain equality and there were plenty of races and religions that stood in the way of that.
There’s plenty of resentment about AA’s voting for Obama but for all the white women and young people who voted for him, apparently not so much. For all the white christians who voted for Bush, apparently not so much.
FLBarbara 07.11.09 at 3:14 am
Lesson I learned
Never read Murphy post and assume there is a party till you read the comments.
Pumas love you all
Sweet Dreams
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:15 am
FLBarbara:
I need an direct line mojito and you weren’t here to hook it up to me.
I’ve been stressed out and under the weather, though I can still move so I guess that’s one level up from being under the bus.
Some more music would be nice. Something cool & quiet.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 3:18 am
Murphy,
Are you calling me a racist because I pointed out that you were singling out race for the cause of behavior? That’s seems like a flimsy basis to turn the argument around. Read the comments again.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 3:19 am
Good night pumas.
FLBarbara 07.11.09 at 3:21 am
Social
One large mojito headed your way with the song of your choice to put you to sweet dreams and a better saturday
Cinie 07.11.09 at 3:21 am
Maybe this is off topic, but why do some view vigorous debate as confrontational attack? Can’t everybody accept that we all have strong beliefs and sometimes we’re wrong? How the hell is anybody going to learn anything if their assumptions are never challenged? And, how can truth prevail if truth tellers wimp out every time they meet opposition? Woman up, ladies.
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:21 am
Oh well, just missed ya, Barbara. Sweet dreams to you, and to all, a good nightie night.
{{BESOS}}
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:25 am
Wait, there you are FLBarbara. You know how to take care of a person! A great Saturday to you too.
When I wake, I shall fight for the right and shun the wrong.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 3:27 am
Murphy
I wanted to tell you about a book I love by Stephen Jay Gould called Rock of Ages -Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life
Stephen Jay Gould was an internationally renowned evolutionist and bestselling author. The book adresses the rift between science and religion. Gould opts in the book for a golden mean that accords dignity and distinction to both science and religion. -paraphrasing from a review.
In any case I think you might really like his book. He really was one of the most respected writers of our time on evolution and zoology. I know his widow through a friend of mine, she’s quite brilliant too.
FLBarbara 07.11.09 at 3:33 am
Good night women of passion
Sweet dreams
Mojitos on me tomorrow
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 3:34 am
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:06 am:
Ahhh… Harvest Gold… I forgot to mention that part… but when you decorate with spray paint, its just few cans away from becoming autumn orange!
Maybe I should spray paint the hardwoods next time, no? I could even faux them with autumn orange in the hallways?
Those year round, artificial, variegated yellow/peach tulips in the window boxes would just make it all flow… (since I have moved them to the interior of the windows now)
Oh, so water-based, painted hardwoods bothers you?
Lol! Makes your skin crawl, too, huh?
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 3:34 am
Cinie –
I thought this debate was healthy, civilized, and vigorous.
Vigorous :: okay.
Uncivilized :: maybe I could get that root canal I’ve been looking forward to.
gotta go, ciao for real
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 3:43 am
Social-Psyche 07.11.09 at 3:06 am:
I have been on both sides of that story… so glad I can laugh about it now!
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 3:43 am
Goodnight.
Cinie 07.11.09 at 3:45 am
It was a general observation based on the last few days’ discussions, MK.
‘Nighty-night.
TexasTigress 07.11.09 at 8:07 am
LOVE this discussion on this thread AND the pumas who are having it .
If I would have been able to participate in real time I would have liked to have pointed out that my good friend MK initially pointed out the SCLC comparrison (which I think is important ) and when my good friend puma bear responded with ” How many orthodox and ultra orthodox Jews support marriage equality. Why don’t you single them out? ”
I would have asked which Jewish groups actively (and Nationally ) advertised their support of prop 8 ?
No group gets a pass for promoting hate , but I imagine if a group puts themselves on the frontline of the issue , they should expect to be the targets of the initial wave of outrage .
Everyone group should be held accountable for their hate campaigns , Mormons , Christians of all stripes , Muslim factions etc.etc. Addressing the organisations in the forefront is in no way giving a pass to those who are guilty on the sidelines (just sayin ) and jumping to the defense of a hateful group and saying that they are being singled out because of a racial association is missing the obvious (to some) point that it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with POWER .
All social movements will forever be compared to the successful AA Civil Rights Movement – not because of race but because of success .
A final thought …
The road to hell is paved by Religion …..
TexasTigress 07.11.09 at 8:10 am
PS – on the pool issue – I think it’s based on Race AND Class , but undoubtedly on hate in general .
TexasTigress 07.11.09 at 8:18 am
PSS I LOVE it when all of you really smart pumas force introspection on me . I (even when just lurking ) have had to examine my own beliefs and question my own positions so often over the last year that I have absolutely no idea where I will eventually end up – and I like it . Thank you for sharing and broadening my perspective .
henry 07.11.09 at 8:44 am
I don’t think it is possible to form an opinion about the pool issue without all of the information. It is far to easy to cry things like racism to silence any opposition even if it is the truth. You pay for private membership and in doing so have expectations. A large group of children showing up after a long bus ride are more likely to be louder and more rambunctious. Any large group of kids of any color, economic status or creed might have had the same effect. How many people were supervising the group? The media airs the salacious story of racism at an affluent private pool without delving into the story. I’d like to know how the non-white members of the club feel.
HopePuma 07.11.09 at 8:50 am
Different topic, but “fresh news” this morning. Sotomayor’s supporters are trying to dig up as much “dirt” on the New Haven firefighters as they can. No matter if you are “for” or “against” Sotomayor’s getting on the SCOTUS, this “stinks” big-time. This reminds me of all those people swarming into AK trying to dig up as much manufactured “dirt” on Palin in order to besmirch her. That was the dems in AK. This is also the dems, only trying to smut up males for the benefit of a female. Doggone it, enough with this kind of shit!
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/71660.html
henry 07.11.09 at 8:56 am
HopePuma
How are any private actions taken by any of the firefighters relevant to the issue which was before the court. I wish there existed a person of means who could turn the tables on these people who have attempted to besmirch Palin and place their pity lives under a microscope for all the world to see. I’ve often wondered why the stars who are harassed incessantly haven’t hired paparazzi to follow the paparazzi.
HopePuma 07.11.09 at 9:19 am
henry, that’s the point. No matter what they “dig up” on the firemen, it was not going to be anything that was introduced in court that had any bearing whatsoever on Sotomayor’s decision. This stinks so bad it isn’t funny. I am getting to tired of political parties sending paid people out to “dig up dirt” on other people; “dirt” that has nothing to do with the situation at hand!!
BTW, is everyone else getting sick and tired (as I am) of seeing and hearing O every day on tv? Was it that the other president’s weren’t talking all over the country every day like O is (WHEN is he ever sitting doing his job as president?); or were they out there every doggone day like he is, but the press just didn’t cover him all the time like they are now? Why is it that every single day we have to see his ugly mug and hear his voice saying “let me be clear” while he’s shifting his gaze from one TOTUS to the other TOTUS back and forth. I am getting so sick of him day after day after day!
HopePuma 07.11.09 at 9:26 am
correction: talking all over the world, not all over the country. Well, to be honest, both. Talking all over the world and all over the country. He’s seldom sitting in the white house; and when he is, he’s living on $100 steaks and lavish parties almost every night. He travels all over the world (and country) with his large entourage (including his personal chefs so he doesn’t get poisoned, or so I hear), oh and don’t forget at least two TOTUS. It wouldn’t surprise me if he doesn’t go anywhere without a minimum of three of them just in case one breaks down. He’s so dependent on them that he may even take four “just to be safe”, LOL.
Cape Hatteras 07.11.09 at 10:09 am
#159 Henry , I love your plan.
The big problem with class in this country is everyone pretends it does not exist . It is another elephant in the room.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 10:32 am
Sorry that this comment has to be a drive by and late to the discussion, but I have to go out this morning. I wanted to bring up the subject of overpopulation that was mentioned last night then passed by for other discussion. Most of the world’s problems in modern time are at their basic root caused by overpopulation. Now, OVERpopulation does not imply population CONTROL such as forced abortion or forced birth control. It can easily be combated by a change in the dialog about having children. Those organizations and societies that contribute to this problem either encourage having lots of children to expand their numbers or disallow birth control such as the Catholic Church (for along long time), Fundamental Christians, Mormons. Muslims, some ethnic groups, etc. create the problem. People should be shown the benefits of smaller families in general, but not as a law. And that can go a long way towards bringing overpoulation under control. Or we can continue to reduce populations by wars and starvation. China’s experiment went awry by only allowing one child, not two, and Chines people decided that if they could only have one child, it must be male – why I do not know.
HopePuma 07.11.09 at 10:37 am
BCL I’m guessing the rationale had to do with the fact that males don’t carry babies. If there were 5 women to every man there could be hypothetically 5 babies for every man. However, with 5 men to every woman (for example) there would only be one child for the 5 men because there would only be one woman to have the child.
Another problem with China’s “one child” law, though was brought out when there was a catastrophe. I don’t remember what it was lately- was it a school collapsing or something like that? Hundreds (or was it more) children died. That meant that all those families lost their ONLY child; and, if the law hadn’t been changed for this exception, the only heir would be dead on hundreds (if not thousands) of homes.
henry 07.11.09 at 10:58 am
I believe that the Chinese want only sons as a man will bring money to the family especially in the smaller villages. I tried to do a little research on it but everything I found was so heartbreaking that I gave up. Painfully sad that there are so many newborn babies left in orphanages to perish while people spend tens of thousands of dollars on fertility treatments. I also don’t understand why the respective governments do not work with adoptions. I guess China would have to admit that perhaps millions of baby girls are left to die or sent to orphanages for that to happen and we know there’s little chance of that.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 11:23 am
Interesting discussion last night. I found it expansive from all sides. Good idea about a thread dedicated to WBD’s excellent points… especially since the 4 principles in the discussion are all blog owners. That makes the creation of interesting threads on the topics all the more likely. That’s a good thing.
I was slightly stunned by the contradiction when I read this headline yesterday, “Civil Rights Group Divided Over Gay Marriage”. I clicked the link not knowing which group that might be. But, sting was added to stunned when I found out.
A civil rights group, founded by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., no less, divided on civil rights for lesbians and gays. It boggles my mind to realize a group I’d expect to identify with the denial of rights to minorities, is divided over the issue to the point of attempting to oust a faction that disagrees with the denial of those rights. It was that simple for me.
As far as “they got theirs”…
U.S. Jews and AAs were allies in the struggle for AA civil rights. So to hear Jessie Jackson refer to a Jewish Orthodox neighborhood in Brooklyn as “Hymietown”, or Al Sharpton refer to Jews, as a group, in a derogatory way, is appalling. Clarence Thomas’s lack of support for “affirmative action” (after EEO put him through school), or his inaction during his entire tenure on the request for licensing a women’s tv channel (think B.E.T.), or the fact that interracial marriage between blacks and whites was illegal until very recently (during my lifetime), and the issue of reparations for descendants of African Americans persistes and remains a relatively current issue. It’s difficult for me to get past the fact that the same groups that had “it” done to them are doing “it” to others. It’s basically for this same reason that I do not support Israel.
I’m also thinking if the bible /religion is the basis of their positions on civil rights, perhaps they should omit the ‘civil rights’ portion of the identity in their brand.
Anyway, thanks for the insightful expansion of the debate. It was educational.
scarlet 07.11.09 at 11:28 am
Bombings Across Iraq as Violence Continues to Soar
Scores Killed in Last 48 Hours, Over 250 Wounded
The death toll in a series of bombings today continued to rise, as Iraq faced the deadliest day since its celebration of “National Sovereignty Day” marked the formal pullback of US troops from the nations cities. Nearly 90 Iraqis have been killed in the past 48 hours, and over 250 wounded.
The biggest single incident was the bombing in Tal Afar, in which bombers dressed in police uniforms attacked a residential neighborhood, killing at least 36 and wounding 84 others. Other bombings today hit Sadr City and Kirkuk.
373 civilians were killed in Iraq in June, nearly triple the number killed in the comparatively quiet month of May. Most of the June deaths came in the second half of the month, and those hoping the spate of high profile bombings in late June were an aberration need only look at the last two days to see the violence is enduring.
Despite the rising death toll, US officials continue to maintain that there is significant progress in Iraq’s security situation. It is never explained, however, how the security situation has managed to become so disconnected with the civilian body count.
http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/09/bombings-across-iraq-as-violence-continues-to-soar/
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 11:44 am
July 11, 2009
Thousands Camp After China Quake
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 8:36 a.m. ET
GUANTUNXIANG, China (AP) — Thousands camped in tents in southwestern China on Saturday after a magnitude-6.0 earthquake destroyed thousands of homes, killed one person and injured 320, state media reported.
At the epicenter of Thursday’s quake in Yao’an county, nearly 22,000 people took shelter in some 3,000 tents, and emergency crews rushed in quilts, rice, cooking oil and other supplies, the official Xinhua News Agency said.
The quake displaced some 250,000 people, the report said, sharply revising downward an initial estimate of 400,000. Xinhua, which cited a deputy governor of Yunnan province where the quake occurred, did not give a reason for the discrepancy. A duty officer at the provincial government offices declined to comment, saying the media office was closed for the weekend.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/07/11/world/AP-AS-China-Earthquake.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 11:50 am
Last night I feel asleep after reading the posts at Cinie’s and didn’t have time to follow this thread.
I woke up this morning with my cup of coffee, half asleep ready to find out what was going on here……………whooooooooooahhhhhhhhh, my head is spinning and I need to wake up more to join this great conversation on every social problem we are facing in America.
By the way, so glad to see some of our old PUMAs back, KatInHerHat, TT…missed you both.
I will just add, Good Morning/Afternoon my PUMA friends.
girlsrule 07.11.09 at 11:51 am
Not sure if this has been posted yet:
LAW WILL LET AFGHAN HUSBANDS STARVE WIVES WHO WITHHOLD SEX:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/law-will-let-afghan-husbands-starve-wives-who-withhold-sex-1740229.html
HP Boston 07.11.09 at 12:10 pm
Well no one is going to starve me…..I am off to a LOBSTA bake, corn, steamers and I have the Cupcakes!
BBL
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 12:17 pm
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that the United States was now seeking “amnesty” for two American journalists imprisoned in North Korea
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/11/world/asia/11diplo.html?_r=1&hpw
simofish 07.11.09 at 12:25 pm
HP wish I was going with you — I am heading out to buy plants and return some brick. Have fun !!
I assume you live in Boston — try this place — I love it –
http://www.thebutchershopboston.com/
Swannie 07.11.09 at 12:34 pm
If anyone is drinking wine at the picnic ( you are making me hungry ) try this treat…. a NICE PINOT NOIR with cold watermelon pieces in it ….mmmm yummyyy ..
henry 07.11.09 at 12:49 pm
girlsrule
Have you ever read Lysistrata or seen it performed? It is a Greek comedy by Aristophanes. Women withholding sex to stop the warring between Sparta and Athens. haven’t read it since college but I feel confident in recommending it.
Rancho 07.11.09 at 12:59 pm
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 11:23 am
. . .It was a very informative and enlightening dialogue, involving highly bright, insightful women I have GREAT respect and admiration for. (Didn’t see it as pleasurable as a “root canal” MK . . not at all!) I appreciated the way everyone respectfully communicated thoughts and insights.
Dances . . .
“Interesting discussion last night. I found it expansive from all sides. Good idea about a thread dedicated to WBD’s excellent points… especially since the 4 principles in the discussion are all blog owners. That makes the creation of interesting threads on the topics all the more likely. That’s a good thing.”
———————————–
AGREED! I saw it this morning and felt like I was watching table tennis for a while
Dances . . was looking for YOU to “put you toes in the water a bit”
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 1:11 pm
Dances . . was looking for YOU to “put you toes in the water a bit”
————–
Nah. I had other priorities and my intellect isn’t at the higher level of last night’s participants. I went to bed and I caught up on the thread this morning while enjoying a cup of coffee and the screeching sounds of movers across the way… sounds like two trains fucking over there.
Interesting discussion tho.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:18 pm
what a glorious day for a picnic HP!
enjoy!
dwp, very interesting. would love to hear how your articulately stated reasoning for being disillusioned with the bigoted attitudes of some civil rights proponents relates to your view of Israel. Not because I disagree with you, but curious about how the issues/ideas are connected for you.
I was blogging until 5am this morning and then dreamed extensively about our discussion when I did finally turn in. Honestly feeling a little burned out. I hope, if you are feeling similarly PumaBear and MK and all who participated, that everyone feels comfortable today and still willing to talk more about the issues again soon.
Rancho 07.11.09 at 1:18 pm
DWP . . .
“intellect isn’t at the higher level of last night’s participants.”
Don’t agree about YOU. You always have something exciting or interesting to say!
But those are MY feelings exactly . .
Your sinus headache better?
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 1:22 pm
Hey Dances:
In my comments last night (#98) I erred by not using the term “religion” rather than “christian” and religious doctrines/principles rather than “biblical”.
I also should have made clear at the end “and at the same each attempting to impose their own religious ideology as a moral standard therefore the exception to the rule”
It’s just that Christians are the most vocally visible thus obvious therefore I sort of defaulted into using “biblical” as my “historical” reference to all doctrines.
I was typing fast and unintentionally ended up framing my opinion into loose talking points.
I’ve been trying to break myself of that, but I obviously had a slip, big time.
Human Rights and Equality are pretty straightforward destinations, if there weren’t so many people trying to tell “God” who’s worthy in One Nation Under [their] God.
Human conditioning to theologies as if they are public policies should be a crime.
Having said all of that – it is really, really enlightening to go back and read the issues that the main parties brought to the table – issues that I have never considered.
I appreciate their time and passion in putting their views on the table.
murphy 07.11.09 at 1:24 pm
“my intellect isn’t at the higher level of last night’s participants.”
BZZZZT! Hogwash!
that’s kind of the point to me. as thinking, decent Americans we are ALL eminently capable of discussing/debating complex issues/problems/questions.
we’re like the Americans deTocqueville was so shocked to find on farms and in log cabins when he traveled the United States in the 1830s and 40s who were confident, intelligent, and participatory enough in their own government to be able to stun him with their sophisticated and articulate conversations about democracy, self-government, and the aims and practices of what they wanted to be a new Utopian society.
that’s YOU dwp, and all of us.
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 1:33 pm
Have a good weekend.
HopePuma 07.11.09 at 1:35 pm
I posted a little earlier about looking for garbage to use against the firefighters who were in Sotomayor’s court and how disgusting it is how the political parties go “digging up” all the “dirt” they can on someone, no matter how irrelevant that “dirt” is to the issues. Now I see the dems are still after Palin. Honestly, I wish there were some way to set up a law saying a maximum number of lawsuits that can put up against one person in a year’s time. There have been NINETEEN again Palin, 15 disproved and 4 pending yet. She has had to pay for these out of her own pocket, and out of the state of AK funds.
Why isn’t there any recourse for Palin to STOP these? The cost of these is unbelievable. If she were thinking of running, the cost of the suits would drain her financially (and in terms of time)to keep her from doing so. Yeah, I know. That’s why they are doing all those lawsuits. But still, there should be some way of stopping this. There is a point where “enough is enough” already!
Here’s the link:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
and the article:
July 11, 2009
Latest ethics complaints should be ‘a wake-up call,’ Palin says
Posted: 01:18 PM ET
From CNN Associate Producer Martina Stewart
(CNN) – The two new ethics complaints filed against Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in the past week should be ‘a wake-up call,’ the former Republican vice presidential candidate says.
In a statement released late Friday night, Palin’s office announced that two more ethics complaints had been filed against the governor in the week since she made her surprise announcement that she plans to step down later this month -including one complaint filed on Friday.
“Although the governor would not have thought it possible, the latest complaint rises to a new level of absurdity in alleging that she has been paid for interviews that she has given to the news media,” Palin’s chief of staff Mike Nizich said in a release announcing the filing of the recent complaints.
“It is amazing to me that anyone could think that, let alone put their name behind it and once again seek to distract state officials and needlessly increase their work load. The state is losing the value of some of its expenditures when public servants are pulled away from important assignments to deal with far-fetched and mean-spirited allegations,” added Nizich.
For her own part Palin used the leveling of two more ethics complaints against her in a week’s time to call for a more productive political discourse in her state.
“The only saving grace in this recent episode is that it proves beyond any doubt the significance of the problem Alaska faces in the ‘new normal’ of political discourse,” Palin also said in Friday’s statement announcing the complaints. “I hope this will be a wake-up call – to legislators, to commentators and to citizens generally – that we need a much more civil and respectful dialogue that focuses on the best interests of the state, rather than the petty resentments of a few.”
Of the total of 19 ethics complaints that have been filed against Palin or her staff, “15 have been resolved without any finding of wrongdoing, and four are now pending,” Friday’s statement from Palin’s office also said.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 1:40 pm
Rancho
Yes, thank you. I think it was eye strain and not a sinus headache, haven’t had one of those in decades. Enjoy your trip!!!
Murphy,
As in the dynamic, in microcosm, of one demographic oppressing another. Israel vs refugees as relative to Germany’s early treatment of the Jews. Jews were done unto and have been doing unto disposessed refugees.
Something akin to internalized oppression redirected to other groups.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 1:51 pm
Murphy #181
I think recognizing / acknowleging / accepting ones (my) inadequacies and limitations (“I could fill a book with what I don’t know.”–Gingy (sp?)) leaves one (me) more open to the perspectives of others. Of course it sometimes takes a major effort, and time, to get past ones (my) blindspots, intellectual laziness, stubborness, and issues of ego.
Cape Hatteras 07.11.09 at 1:55 pm
Ozero worship alert. puke
http://www.newsweek.com/id/205961
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 2:05 pm
Cape Hatteras #186
Puke is right!
“The hierarchy ignores women’s equality and gays’ cry for justice because to heed them would require that it admit error and acknowledge that the self-satisfied edifice constructed around sex and gender has been grievously wrong.”
And the Pope and obloviator differ… how…?
Airbag alert. Stat!
admin 07.11.09 at 2:23 pm
sometimes the most blatant inconsistencies are staring us right in the face huh?
though I give Kennedy Townsend respect for her excellent writing and no holds barred view (noting her MAJOR blindspot of course). It is downright ODD how rare it is to read such blatantly anti-sexist remarks in a mainstream media outlet.
wait. no, it’s not.
tsunami 07.11.09 at 2:46 pm
This is freakin’ crazy!!!!
‘He thinks that the bloggers have been rampaging out of control and that new laws need to be written to corral them’.
‘Sunstein also believes that – whether you’re a blogger, The New York Times or a Web hosting service – you should be held responsible even for what your commenters say’.
‘He worries that we are headed for a future in which “people’s beliefs are a product of social networks working as echo chambers in which false rumors spread like wildfire.” That future, though, is already here, according to Sunstein. ”
What, like a freakin’ cocktail party filled with a bunch of Ivy League snobs who worship O’Idiot? Clueless!!!
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07112009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/gag_the_internet__178749.htm
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 2:51 pm
tsunami
un.freakin.be.liev.able!!!
Oh wait… obama got to where he is based on the very things “obama’s obama” is crusading against… lies, rumors, innuendo.
goddamned bastards
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 2:54 pm
Jeepers I have no idea where to jump into the conversation but I often hold back in areas that I only ‘know’ as an outsider and let the one’s that have ‘experienced’ the topic first hand take the lead while I observe and learn. One example of this is the Civil Rights vs the bigot train of thought. I have supported Civil Rights since I was a wipper snapper, but since I am a white woman, I did not experince what AA felt and still feel in our society. I have opinions but not from inside experience so I lurk and learn.
Republican women being feminists – Well since I have never been a Republican, nor am I well grounded by religious beliefs, I can only state my opinions as a Liberal/Centralist feminist…that I have felt a part of since I was a little bigger than a wipper snapper.
I am sure there are Republican women that think of themselves as feminists, women like Sarah Palin and others and who am I to say I am more of a feminist then they are just because I am pro-choice.
Sounds to me like part of the problem with the PUMAsphere is to draw the line in the sand for ‘us’ and for ‘them’. Are they part of our group of feminists or should they just take their astroturf apron and go iron the shirts of the men they follow.
Doesn’t seem like Sarah Palin does as much ironing of her man’s shirts as he does playing Mr. Mom. Do that make her a feminist?
The way I look at it, I don’t care who calls themselves a feminists, who argues the strongest with the most link backup, who gets the loudest. It doesn’t change a thing. Only ACTION changes anything.
I would like women to work together to move women forward not pigeonhole one another.
I also don’t worry about some poor lone Republican sweet talking me over to the darkside.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 2:56 pm
Does that make her a feminist?
Rancho 07.11.09 at 2:57 pm
BillieJo! Yes! Yes! Yes!
“I would like women to work together to move women forward not pigeonhole one another.”
——-
Key words . .TOGETHER, FORWARD, NOT pigeonhole!
Cape Hatteras 07.11.09 at 3:01 pm
#189 Oligarchists fear the Net . It puts information and communication in the hands of commoners.
In the 1600s two inovations drove political progress , the printing press and the coffee house .
The press took information monopoly from the powerfull and the scribes they employed . The coffee house became the blogs of the day . Instead of drinking themselves into a stupor after work , private citizens stayed awake and hammered out new ideas on government , rights , freedom and justice . The rulers Too late tried to shut the coffee house down .
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 3:02 pm
If blog owners are going to be held responsible for libelous comments /commenters… what would stop the miscreant stalker dickweeds from bombarding anyone’s blog in order to make them face libel charges? Nothing… god knows they aren’t ethical and are lacking morals.
Wouldn’t be surprised if owhatapieceofwork hired more lackies to do just that. Jackassed losers.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 3:05 pm
oooooooooo forgive all my typos, I need to get my keyboard under control.
admin 07.11.09 at 3:13 pm
stunning news all around the Pumasphere today. wow, tsunami that is REALLY scary. I’ve read some pretty smart commenters who are afraid Sotomayor is a bait-and-switch nominee and that obama and his crew WANT her to be denied so that he can slip Sunstein in.
I dont really buy that, I think Soto is going to be confirmed by a wide margin. But Bader Ginsburg (god forgive me) AND Kennedy might both be up for replacement before obama’s first term is up and it’s no secret that Cass is on obama’s list of Supreme Court nominees.
I gotta read the link you posted but it sounds like Sunstein may be an actual example of the elusive “liberal fascist.”
I also gotta hope that even the most koolaide drenched BOIZ bloggers will be up in arms over this. Remember how apoplectic they would get when any Republicans would call for more “civility” in the blogosphere? you would think the Repubs had been calling for outright censorship the way they exploded with outrage and righteous indignation. Now we have a “liberal democrat” who is already one of the presidents closest advisors calling for, well, OUTRIGHT CENSORSHIP.
the mind boggles.
then recovers and starts planning Resistance.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 3:14 pm
DancesWithPumas
If blog owners are going to be held responsible
————
Ahhhhhh Dances, holding a blog responsible for it’s blogger’s comments is BULLSHIT! (I know you also think this is crap too Dances)
Murphy is not responsible for what I am saying. I am not her sock puppet and any other blogger that is too much of a coward to come on our blog and be specific about her accusations and pass judgment on Murphy for the rants we pass out or the non-pc statements that are tossed around every now and then, they can Kiss my Ass and Kiss Murphy’s too.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 3:18 pm
BillieJo
Of course I think it’s bullshit… that doesn’t mean obama and obama’s obama won’t do it.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07112009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/gag_the_internet__178749.htm
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 3:19 pm
(((Rancho))) Yup, we have an agenda of getting the ERA ratified and Alice Paul the Honor she deserves and we need all the women working together on this.
I found some awesome photos that I want to design ERA t-shirts with…will post them on the blog when I get them designed.
Love you Rancho and all the work you put into the prowl. Go Rancho Go!!
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 3:20 pm
Just turned on my tv and Hillary Clinton is speaking at a State Dept. Town Hall meeting now on C-Span. She looks really good.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 3:24 pm
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 3:18 pm
BillieJo
Of course I think it’s bullshit… that doesn’t mean obama and obama’s obama won’t do it.
————-
Oh yea, I know the Jackass wants us all to kiss his ring but that ain’t gonna happen. If they want to start shutting down blogs that call him a JACKASS then a new one is formed. If he thinks he can wipe out dissension like Iran did to it’s protesters, I will make it my full-free-time hobby to get around his antics. That’s why God made Hackers!!!
tsunami 07.11.09 at 3:25 pm
#197
admin
the mind boggles.
then recovers and starts planning Resistance.
The more you read in that link the more ballistic you will become.
Sunstein is everything Orwell warned us about!
Rancho 07.11.09 at 3:29 pm
Yeah, Billie Jo . . . An ERA shirt! Sign me up! I’m sure it will be as wonderful as your flyer! What a great idea! Wherever you go, you are opening up the opportunity for dialogue for ERA. You have my email. Thank YOU for your support and all that YOU do!
Dragonfly 07.11.09 at 3:32 pm
Rancho,
Letters to the 19 going out today! Mailed my Congressman (who is a man) yesterday.
Looking forward to the 20 – especially Pelosi. Grrrrrrrrrr
simofish 07.11.09 at 3:37 pm
doing a drop by as I had to deliver a bench and pot then back out on the road for more shopping —
IF Bloggers are held responsible for the bloggers who show up and blog then I am heading straight over the Huffington Post and others and let fucking hell break loose !!
Running out again.
Rancho 07.11.09 at 3:43 pm
(((HI DRAGONFLY!))) Yeah!
Also, (((goofsmom, MK, PUMABear, CASPER, wontbackdown, sheila7, shadowfax, michelina, susie 1945, sunshinelvr, normapapuma, bigcatlover, . . . . .snd anyone else who has expressed an interest in contacting the other 20, LIKE PELOSI1! )))
I emailed Murphy and Dances the list of the other 20 this morning. It would probably be a good idea to wait for “The First 19″ to go out . . .you know . . . the “athletic supporters”! (The women who supported Arnold Palmer and the golf bill but NOT Alice Paul.
It will be “distributed” with their own timing/discretion, but I wanted them to have it now ’cause I’m going on a little trip for about a week.
Gotta go . . BBL
admin 07.11.09 at 3:45 pm
Billie Jo! great to see you.
very well said, as always. I really agree with you about the “poor lone Republican sweet talking me over to the darkside” menace. Not because it’s an inherently condescending “concern” (which it is) but because it points out an obvious element of silliness to the whole meta-conversation. It’s not like hordes of fundamentalist Christian Republican women are clamoring to join the cause for civil rights for LGBT or the cause for equal rights/opportunities for women or the cause for reproductive privacy. Sometimes it strikes me as silly that we spend a lot of time worrying and fretting about whether rabid Republican fundamentalists will infiltrate our cause and bend it to their nefarious will. Those sorts of people are either uninterested in our causes or are actively working AGAINST us. But we forget that and end up seeing boogeymen where there are none.
The range of women’s political views as wide as anyone’s — all the way along the wide spectrum — and most of us are not at either end, or ARE at either end but only on SOME issues. the true far-left or far-right diehards are very few. I think we make a mistake when we assume too quickly that someone is too far left or right for us to work together with.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 4:11 pm
Okay My Rant for the Day: Stop with the boxes, labels and separation into to subsections of Women.
I know christian fundementalist DEMOCRATS… Iknow Republican Pro Choicers… I know Republican pro-gay marriage advocates… I know Democrat Pro lifers….
STOP IT… Women do not and can not fit into the neatly described and long held beliefs of any, any, any political organization.
Women are being held down and stuffed into boxes made by tagging them with labels. Women are far more complex in their beliefs and do not ascribe to any one particular main stream political ideal.
If women are going to get together and make a difference, advance what is best for us, we have to stop labeling each other and ourselves.
Women do not fit wholely into any one set catagory, we are all over the place and we like it… “Don’t fence Women into some old boys political party, we aren’t that simple”
Thus ends my rant for the day….
CJK 07.11.09 at 4:17 pm
I’m just glad to see that everyone on the PUMA PAC blog — which I love so dearly and consider home — made it through last night’s barbecue at Simo’s without skewering or being skewered! I lurked for a while, and then had to get some rest. Like DWP, I had a really bad headache, perhaps from eyestrain resulting from too much web research re the Walpin firing.
I offer the following from a web site I came across while researching ‘bigotry.’ (I was especially moved by the quotes from Coretta Scott King, MLK’s widow.) Thanks. http://www.brainyquote.com/words/bi/bigotry136728.html
Definition:
bigotry: The state of mind of a bigot; obstinate and unreasoning attachment [to] one’s own belief and opinions, with narrow-minded intolerance of beliefs opposed to them. The practice or tenets of a bigot.
——–
quotes about bigotry:
“Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends.”
Maya Angelou
“Bigotry tries to keep truth safe in its hand with a grip that kills it.”
Rabindranath Tagore
“Homophobia is like racism and anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood.”
Coretta Scott King
“I believe all Americans who believe in freedom, tolerance and human rights have a responsibility to oppose bigotry and prejudice based on sexual orientation.”
Coretta Scott King
“Bigotry is the sacred disease.”
Heraclitus
“Look back, to slavery, to suffrage, to integration and one thing is clear. Fashions in bigotry come and go. The right thing lasts.”
Anna Quindlen
“Bigotry murders religion to frighten fools with her ghost.”
Charles Caleb Colton
“The left sees nothing but bigotry and superstition in the popular defense of the family or in popular attitudes regarding abortion, crime, busing, and the school curriculum.”
Christopher Lasch
CJK 07.11.09 at 4:20 pm
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 4:11 pm
I love and agree with your ‘rant,’ goofsmom!
Cinie 07.11.09 at 4:21 pm
http://washingtonindependent.com/49790/palin-still-finds-fans-in-anti-abortion-movement
It’s just not true that there aren’t anti-feminist forces actively working against the feminist agenda. The Independent Women’s Forum was born as an adjunct of FreedomWorks, a known rightwing AstroTurfing machine.
The quote is from Source Watch, but I didn’t want to risk too many links in one post.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 4:28 pm
Sorry, guess I wasn’t done ranting….
To get elected Women must name a Party either Dem or Rep. They can’t do Ind because that pretty much kills their chance of being elected.
Then to get the parties support they must avow the party platform, the woman candidate may only back or believe part of the party platform… but we the women voter start painting them with the broad brush… Well if they are a Dem candidate we support them because they believe in pro choice, same sex marriage, yada, yada, yada…. and if they are a Rep candidate they must support pro life, anti same sex marriage and be a christian…
Give me a break… The women candidate has to pick a party or they won’t be elected… that does NOT mean they espouse everything that party believes in… it means they want to have a chance at getting elected… Again, I don’t believe any of the women in elected office right now avow or espouses the political platform of the party they represent 100%.
My 2 cents and I think I’m done ranting for today….
sistermoon3 07.11.09 at 4:28 pm
Cinie, i have an idea, why dont you just call governor sarah palin’s office or write her, she’s got emails, she’s got pretty much the rest of the civil world has believe it or not. I know Katie Couric has some of believing Sarah cant read, but you really should just go to the horse’s mouth. I know someone who actually got a hand written thank you note from sarah. So, im quite sure if you just asked sarah, would you like to abolish roe vs. wade, she will tell you. Then, depending on her answer you will have solid grouds for a lot of things. Matter of fact
i will write her myself as well so we can have both sides.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 4:33 pm
FYI, my comments at #213 were not in response to anyones post… I just hadn’t finished ranting…
Cinie 07.11.09 at 4:34 pm
Let me amend that, IWF was formed in support of Clarence Thomas in 1992. They joined up with Americans for Prosperity/Citizens for a Sound Economy/FreedomWorks.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Americans_For_Prosperity_Foundation
Cinie 07.11.09 at 4:39 pm
Fine, I’m out. I’ve done all the “good deeding” and gotten punished for it that I’m willing to stand. But, let me leave you with this, I wrote it earlier and debated posting it. But, given the way I’m feeling, I’ll share, and I’m out:
I envy you guys’ sororital spirit and your faith in sisterhood. I don’t understand it, but I envy it. Things would be much simpler if I could embrace that attitude, but I can’t. I’m tired. I can’t tell the good guys from the bad even with a scorecard. Everything’s upside down and nothing makes sense anymore.
I wonder, if any of you were police officers and some woman set fire to a car with her husband in it, would you feel her pain, or lock her ass up? What if you hated her husband, too?
If you were on a PTA board, and one of the mothers was advocating giving Ritalin to active students in the nurse’s office, would you embrace her sisterness, or yell at her to sit down and STFU? Doesn’t it matter what a person, any person, advocates, believes in, does?
I’m not being bitchy or snarky here, I’m really disillusioned and troubled. But, I recognize it’s probably just me. Don’t mean to bring anybody down, I just need to vent.
Thanks
Cinie
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 4:43 pm
((((Cinie))))
It’s okay to vent and also to point out things you have discovered that others may not have had the time to research… For that I thank you….
I hope you weren’t reading my rants as a reaction to your posts, they’re not…
CJK 07.11.09 at 4:56 pm
Some thoughts: IMO, it’s impossible for ANY type of ‘organization’ — left, middle or right, political, religious, social or otherwise — to ever completely represent the thinking of any group of people. Each person is a unique individual, with a unique set of genetics, experiences, education, personality and psychological traits, etc., etc., etc. Each person ultimately is responsible for examining, questioning, re-questioning their own attitudes, beliefs, behaviors as they go through life. To blindly and continually look to any particular ‘organization’ or set of organizations to think for us, speak for us, provide us with labels, opinions, talking points, etc., without each of us doing the work of thinking things through on our own, is to abandon our individual humanity — acting instead as a mindless ‘mob’– perhaps ultimately only in a vain effort to always be accepted and viewed as ‘politically correct.’
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:01 pm
CJK,
#219 – Very true and ultimately that “mob” mentality is what got “O” elected… People are not being taught in school the path of critical thinking. They are being taught how to pass the tests.. Very sad state of affairs….
sistermoon3 07.11.09 at 5:08 pm
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/govmail.php
there’s the email, i think everyone on this blog should flat out
write to governor sarah palin and ask her, would you fight to overturn roe vs. wade, surly someone will get an answer. I just wrote her and told her i wanted to know if she would do that. I will be waiting for a response.
CJK 07.11.09 at 5:16 pm
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:01 pm
Thanks, goofsmom. BTW, I love and agree with both your ‘rants.’
Critical thinking is, indeed, what is sadly and sorely lacking in our educational system, and in our national discourse. No matter what one may think of Sarah Palin, throughout all the baseless, horrific, mindless attacks, she seems to have remained fiercely independent and to have retained her personal integrity and individual humanity. IMO, she is not in thrall to any party or organization, and I hope she remains that way. Only by keeping herself free of such entanglements/obligations and eschewing ‘political correctness’ can she emerge as the national leader we so desperately need to unify the multitude of factions that have almost completely fractured and paralyzed our democratic republic.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:18 pm
bottom line is that you must form coalitions in order to win power and achieve your goals as a group. Those coalitions are going to shift from time to time and that is not an evil thing. There are no true good guys and bad guys anymore. This past year should have made that painfully clear. You form coalitions where everybody involved can win a little and no one party undermines another’s goal – I’m talking about groups here, not individuals. Idealogical purity stands in the way of that. It is not evil as long as the purpose of each group is not evil, but just different. Shared goals and power helps keep individual power in check, but moves the group goal forward.
CJK 07.11.09 at 5:19 pm
sistermoon3 07.11.09 at 5:08 pm
Thanks for the e-mail addy, sistermoon3! I will e-mail her, too.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:20 pm
sistermoon3,
#221 – Sorry I’m not writing to Palin to find out her views on Roe V Wade… Frankly, it really doesn’t matter what she thinks because she is no longer politically viable after the end of this month.
She becomes one more of the vast population of pundits and talking heads, she can not and was never able to affect Roe v. Wade… the only way to affect Roe v. Wade is to bring a case in front of the SCOTUS… No one, the President or Congress can do anything to Roe v. Wade with out a legal case or argument in front of the SCOTUS.
Sorry I’m grumpy today… Not personal, just tired of it being made an issue… We should be writing to our representatives on issues that need to be addressed, overturned or passed that are being considered right now and Roe v Wade isn’t one of them.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:28 pm
CJK,
# 222 – Sorry about Palin, it’s true though once her time is over at the end of the month she becomes no more than another voice in the vast expanse of MSM.
I’m not going to dream, speculate or “hope” for her to do anything more than what she has said. She will become another guest speaker at many functions, with the title of “was candidate for VP”
Like I said I’m grumpy and I probably need a timeout…
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:32 pm
Does anyone follow Alaska politics enough to know if there is a Senate or Congressional seat opening up in the near future that Palin may be eyeing after she takes a break from the stress of dealing with the left wing attack machine. She seems too ambitious to leave politics completely and for too long. She was a successful politiican, why would she give that up.
Cape Hatteras 07.11.09 at 5:39 pm
We have too many politicians but no leaders . We have smooth talking focus grouped salesmen but no communicators . We have candidates with super resume`s but none with character.We have people with generations of experiance in office but none who can get things done .
The Harvardocracy insiders have FAILED ! @#$%^&*()*&%$$
FLBarbara 07.11.09 at 5:44 pm
Hey Pumas since you are all at Simo’s Barbecue I have a special drink for a relaxing Saturday evening
Get a tall glass with ice
1 oz of Patron Silver
1/4 oz of Patron Citronge
Pomegranate juice
Fresh lime
It is so refreshing
Cheers
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 5:44 pm
CJK 07.11.09 at 5:16 pm:
While I agree with the ideals, they assume that woman’s rights to equality are firmly in place, violence and sexism against women are considered taboos, women have equitable presence in all legislative bodies and a woman’s reproductive rights are no longer under constant threat as immoral, illegal and a liberal feminist issue only.
Whether we like it or not, those are all common issues affecting all women and there is simply no way that my beliefs about what is important grants me protection without being a part of a collective voting block that supports my rights to that protection.
CJK 07.11.09 at 5:45 pm
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:28 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:32 pm
I may be just a wide-eyed optimist, but I don’t think Palin is out of politics. I read her comments on her official web site, and read nothing indicating or intimating she was leaving politics. Many male politicians give up current offices in order to free themselves to run for higher offices. Yet, when Sarah Palin does the same thing, everyone reads it to mean she’s throwing in the towel. At the end of her remarks on her web site, she quoted General MacArther: “We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.” Also, I read that before her announcement, a number of influential members of the GOP contacted her in order to speak with her. Those people simply do not do that unless something very major is in the works. So, I’m of the opinion, as I’ve posted before, that her announcement right before the July 4 holiday was Sarah Palin’s own particular ‘declaration of independence.’ I believe she wants to unify and lead this country. I’m not counting her out.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:45 pm
Cape Hatteras,
#228 – Truer words were never spoken!!!!!
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 5:51 pm
Big Cat,
#227 – Private sector speaking gigs pay a hell of a lot more than political positions.
CJK
#231 – IMHO, it really doesn’t matter… until she declares, I can’t consider her… I can only work with what is really going on in politics right now and not a maybe.
I can only focus on supporting those women who are truely running for elected positions, whether it is on the school board, legislative district or for the Presidency.
These are the women that need and should have my support right NOW. Focusing on a maybe candidate does not get any of these other women in office!
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:51 pm
CJK 07.11.09 at 5:45 pm
I agree. How many ways did she need to say that she was going to work for the whole country, not just Alaska for the idiots to get it that she is not just walking away.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:54 pm
goofsmom
Discussing future possibilities does not have to interfere with working for obvious candidates. How can you possibly be positioned to act quickly, if you are not looking ahead – at all possibilities, not just the obvious ones.
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:00 pm
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 5:44 pm
WBD, BCL, of course coalitions and groups with shared purpose(s) are necessary to help individuals achieve shared goals. And, I agree that coalitions do indeed shift over time. I also agree that there are no longer any organizations that are true ‘good guys’ and ‘bad guys.’ Last year, HRC supporters were abandoned and betrayed by virtually all the organizations we had previously trusted. All I’m trying to say is that the necessary support and help of coalitions and groups that share our purpose(s) and goals still does not relieve each of us of the personal obligation to continually think, examine, re-examine situations and to come to our own conclusions/decisions/actions. In fact, I think it’s imperative that each individual who aligns with a coalition or group continue to think critically in order to be a more effective participant and to help achieve shared goals.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 6:02 pm
BigCat,
#235 – If a candidate is running for congress the next elections are 2010… If they are running for the presidency the next election is 2012…
I have an election in my county on Aug. 25th for Water District and Fire Protection District Board Members. Who should I as a voter be concentrating on supporting women candidates right now for?
Also, if Palin runs for a congressional position, I can do emails, mails, faxes etc to support her but I can not vote for her.
I’m looking far enough ahead… when she (Palin) declares then I will act. Until then…….
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:04 pm
CJK
Of course, you are right. But one does not preclude the other. I think most of us are not followers, but are individual thinkers, so that goes without saying. I’m saying, try to think strategically while you are acting individually.
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 6:04 pm
CJK: I see what your point is now and it is absolutely correct for me.
Re Sarah Palin: I think she’ll run.
At this point, I have no concerns that she’ll ruin the whole damned country.
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:07 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:51 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 5:54 pm
Yup and yup! Also, I think Palin will likely fundraise/campaign for candidates in 2010 to help bring a better bipartisan balance to Congress by unseating the BO ‘rubber stampers.’ Plus, it’s going to take A LOT of money for her to run in 2012. It’s not too early for her backers to start strategizing, organizing and fundraising.
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 6:09 pm
Gotta go. Later.
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:10 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:04 pm
wontbackdown 07.11.09 at 6:04 pm
WBD, BCL, thanks, and glad we’re on the same page.
admin 07.11.09 at 6:12 pm
woman sets her husband on fire? I’d arrest her and do what I could to make sure she goes to JAIl for MURDER. whether I liked or hated the guy — murder is murder. Whether I “felt her pain” or not would depend a lot on the circumstances, no? but whatever empathy i might have for whatever fucked up life or pain she might have been in would NOT extend to a pass for murder.
teachers over-prescribing Ritalin to boys? I dont approve — not at all.
of COURSE it matters what people say and do, how could it not? Being a woman doesnt automatically excuse or preclude her from being a bigot or a liar or a criminal or a homophobe or a child abuser or an asshole.
Women dont have power, political representation, money, freedom, or the ability to pursue their ambitions to the same degree that men do. The differential between women and men in terms of power, money, etc is not the same in every place and for every class of women, of course. there are not only ranges and gradations there are also important differences among individual women and men. Some women are stronger, richer, and more free than some men.
The point is NOT that all women are good, admirable, and kind and we should all collectively deny the reality that many of us are nasty, greedy, and criminal.
The point is that ALL women have the right to the SAME DEGREE of power, money, personal freedom, and opportunity that men have. Even the bigots and ignorant women. Even the criminals and homophobic women.
What I think we need to collectively work against and try to eradicate is the reflex we have to question, deny, and degrade a woman’s WOMANHOOD based on her behavior or opinions.
That doesnt mean we question or deny a crazy woman’s insanity or a criminal woman’s criminality or a mean woman’s meanness.
Phyllis Schalfly is an ASSHOLE and a BIGOT and a nasty lying person. But whatever work or struggle or change we are able to achieve to improve the power and freedom of women is work we are doing for HER too. Whether she likes it or not. Whether she wants it or not. Whether she hates us or not.
I wont in theory or practice exclude her from the circle of women. I will exclude her from the circle of people I call friend. I will exclude women child abusers and violent criminals from the circle I call civilized members of society.
Not all women are good. But all women are feminists because they live as WOMEN. To deny them that identity sets the stage and makes it justifiable to exclude ANY of us from the circle.
Phyllis Schlafly and Sarah Palin are excluded for you Cinie. But YOU Cinie are excluded by women who deny womanhood to lesbians or deny womanhood to those without children (not sure if you have kids or not, pardon me if you do).
When one person believes circles can be drawn to exclude women from womanhood than ALL women are isolated, me and you too.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 6:15 pm
#240 – If I were to support Palin it would be because she supported ALL women candidates in 2010.
I don’t care diddly poop about a Bipartisan congress, I’m working for a BIGENDER representative congress. Partisan schmartisan, after everything I have been through this past election cycle, I have learned that the parties are two sides of the same coin…
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:17 pm
Let me explain why I am speaking in such general terms that might be throwing others off tract as to my point. I’m open to supporting Palin if she decides to run and no one else that I support more is running for the same office, but she is not my only hope for the future. My goal is to get women in office, many women in office, and so that is what I am watching for. When an opportunity comes up, I’ll be menatally ready without having to agonize over whether or not I can support their every position or not. If there is something that I just can’t support, I’ll look around for someone else. I’m open to possibilities and flexible. I’m fine with that.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 6:19 pm
admin 07.11.09 at 3:45 pm
Billie Jo! great to see you.
very well said, as always. I really agree with you about the “poor lone Republican sweet talking me over to the darkside” menace. Not because it’s an inherently condescending “concern” (which it is) but because it points out an obvious element of silliness to the whole meta-conversation. It’s not like hordes of fundamentalist Christian Republican women are clamoring to join the cause for civil rights for LGBT or the cause for equal rights/opportunities for women or the cause for reproductive privacy. Sometimes it strikes me as silly that we spend a lot of time worrying and fretting about whether rabid Republican fundamentalists will infiltrate our cause and bend it to their nefarious will. Those sorts of people are either uninterested in our causes or are actively working AGAINST us. But we forget that and end up seeing boogeymen where there are none.
The range of women’s political views as wide as anyone’s — all the way along the wide spectrum — and most of us are not at either end, or ARE at either end but only on SOME issues. the true far-left or far-right diehards are very few. I think we make a mistake when we assume too quickly that someone is too far left or right for us to work together with.
————
Once again Murph you show me how much better you are at expressing my thoughts than I am. And that’s no joke.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 6:19 pm
BigCat,
#245 – Same here… very well said…
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:22 pm
admin 07.11.09 at 6:12 pm
Yes! Include. Do not exclude. Yet that doesn’t mean taking leave of our obligations as human beings to common sense, common good, courtesy, critical thinking, decency and the laws of civilized, peace-seeking societies.
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:29 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:17 pm
I agree, BCL. One reason I’m straightforward in supporting Palin (if indeed she ultimately runs) is because I believe HRC absolutely will not run. I think HRC’s political future has been damaged severely and perhaps irreparably by her associations with BO. But, with that said, a lot can happen in the next year or so. If, my some miracle, HRC does run, and if Palin also runs, it will be a tough decision for me personally. But, it’s certainly a dilemma I’d love to have!
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 6:33 pm
If, my some miracle, HRC does run, and if Palin also runs, it will be a tough decision for me personally. But, it’s certainly a dilemma I’d love to have!
————-
No dilemma here. HRC hands down.
Back to painting.
over
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:36 pm
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:29 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:17 pm
I agree, BCL. One reason I’m straightforward in supporting Palin (if indeed she ultimately runs) is because I believe HRC absolutely will not run. I think HRC’s political future has been damaged severely and perhaps irreparably by her associations with BO. But, with that said, a lot can happen in the next year or so. If, my some miracle, HRC does run, and if Palin also runs, it will be a tough decision for me personally. But, it’s certainly a dilemma I’d love to have!
**************************************
HRC has always had many enemies and she may have gained a few more by joining Bo’s admin, but that has not damaged her irreparably, except in the monds of the purists. Things change fast and she may be resurrected sooner than we can imagine – or not. We just have to wait and see.
goofsmom 07.11.09 at 6:44 pm
Sorry, HRC hands down also… for many, many reasons….
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:46 pm
I watched HRC this afternoon for 1 1/2 hours at her State Dept town hall meeting. The room was packed with dept employees and she was warm, open enthusiastic about their ideas for improvements, whether it was for showers for the employees who run or bike to work, or switching their browser to Firefox or dispartity in pay for those who work in less prestigious countries. She asked how many in the audience were interns and a large cheer went up. She found out the website address from her staff for the interns to visit and told the employees to keep in touch with their interns after they left. She could have a grudge with interns since one almost derailed Bill’s Presidency, but she’s bigger than that. Damn, she was good today! I cannot believe that she will not come back if she wants to.
CJK 07.11.09 at 6:48 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:36 pm
Agreed, BCL. It has just so saddened/sickened me to see an accomplished, brilliant, dedicated, experienced, strong woman as HRC, who’s devoted her entire life to serving all the people of this country, be shoved aside and expected to kowtow to an obviously inferior male.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:50 pm
CJK
It happens all the time to those women.
stoney42 07.11.09 at 6:52 pm
I watched Hillary too. Had things to do, but couldn’t turn it off.
gojoyknocks 07.11.09 at 7:04 pm
Hey Pumas…Thinking of changing my name to Thin Lipped White Woman.
Murphy, You have mail.
CJK 07.11.09 at 7:05 pm
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 6:50 pm
Sadly, yes it does, and it probably has happened/still happens/will happen to many (or most women)in virtually all endeavors unless we keep calling out and combatting sexism/misogyny wherever we find it. It’s the reason I became an activist back in the’70s and the reason I consider PUMA PAC home. Gotta go. Memories of last August’s sham convention have made my headache worse again. BBL.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 7:08 pm
CJK
Sorry about your headache. You’re right that it’s changing what happened to HRC and others that we are working for.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 7:44 pm
What Dances said in 250 goes for me too, but without the paint.
——–
Cinie
Fine, I’m out. I’ve done all the “good deeding” and gotten punished for it that I’m willing to stand. But, let me leave you with this, I wrote it earlier and debated posting it. But, given the way I’m feeling, I’ll share, and I’m out:
I envy you guys’ sororital spirit and your faith in sisterhood. I don’t understand it, but I envy it. Things would be much simpler if I could embrace that attitude, but I can’t. I’m tired. I can’t tell the good guys from the bad even with a scorecard. Everything’s upside down and nothing makes sense anymore.
…
I’m not being bitchy or snarky here, I’m really disillusioned and troubled. But, I recognize it’s probably just me. Don’t mean to bring anybody down, I just need to vent.
———–
Cinie, it’s good for the soul to vent. Hey, over here at PUMApac it’s a way of life. No ulcers here.
I don’t always agree with you Cinie but I sure do admire you and after reading Murphy’s posts, you are next on my list of checking out the PUMAsphere.
There is some sort of peace when you don’t have to worry if someone measures up to your standards of feminism or not, there also is a calm not worring that Pro-choice rights will be ripped out from under you four years from now.
Without worrying about these two things right now it gives us time to work on pushing all women forward instead of isolating ourselves further in society. After this election, PUMAs are isolated enough all ready.
Even here on PUMApac, far right winged people have run off almost completely. And if someone is sneaky and tries to turn us further right, all the way past pro-choice issues……….do you really think they can really herd this wild pack of cats? Ain’t gonna happen.
Cinie, I also wonder why you declare yourself as not being a feminist and yet you worry so much about Liberal Feminists being hijacked by right winged astroturfers.
Rest assured Cinie, you are among friends here, even if we are a wild bunch that think for ourselves.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 7:50 pm
goofsmom #209 and CJK #219
Very well put and I totally agree with both of you.
tsunami 07.11.09 at 7:53 pm
#227
BCL
‘Does anyone follow Alaska politics enough to know if there is a Senate or Congressional seat opening up in the near future that Palin may be eyeing after she takes a break from the stress of dealing with the left wing attack machine’.
********************
Lisa Murkowski’s Senate seat is up for grabs in 2010.
I don’t believe that there is much love lost between SP and the Murkowski dynasty. SP up on the hill? 1600 would s*** a brick!
She would consume alot of the oxygen from Obamaland. Esp. by the time 2011 rolls around.
Funny comment from the linked interview below:
‘Palin says she even heard a rumor that she resigned because pornographic pictures of her were about to hit the Internet. This left her bemused. “Between which pregnancies did I get to pose for those?” she said sarcastically’.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/708gpxia.asp
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 8:01 pm
hello pumas,
Been off having fun and doing some chores. I’ve caught up with this afternoon’s conversation, and there are many comments I want to respond to.
Puttin’ on my kevlar and gathering my thoughts. BBL
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 8:12 pm
re: #189 tsunami — Thanks for the NYTimes link to Cass Sunstein’s opinions in his forthcoming book “On Rumors”.
His opinions on the alleged dangers of the blogosphere are extremely alarming … if coupled with authority to convert those opinions to policy, either via the Executive branch or the Judicial branch.
I am extremely interested in this topic and rest assured that I will followup with further research.
In the meantime, there is a done-deal that everyone should be worried about, and that is the CyberSecurity policy which is a continuation of + expansion of the Bush program. It is real and it is now, and it affects anyone who visits federal government websites (xxxxxx.GOV) or emails government officials. I found it alarming enough to write a post … more here if you are interested.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 8:14 pm
Admin #197
Sunstein posibly a liberal facist. I think you might be right and it seems to me that Obamamania is breeding alot of this liberal fascism.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 8:16 pm
ps, regarding CyberSecurity …
please note the recent news reports of cyberattacks coming from North Korea against US and South Korean websites.
The foundation is out there now, in the news, the provide a rationale for urgency for Obama’s cybersecurity czar.
Is this Obama’s yellowcake, or is it real? I do not know. I just know that I do not trust the government, and I do not trust Obama.
tsunami 07.11.09 at 8:36 pm
#264
MK
New York Post.
Pravda on the Hudson isn’t ready for this.
WSJ is on it.
AniEm 07.11.09 at 8:43 pm
Juliette #261
I read on previous threads that you’re not giving up a career in lovely world of classical music to run for office in Philadelphia. I’m chagrined and CAN’T understand your decision. I could have delivered the frankford-fishington vote!
I’m gonna echo Juliette’s admiration for goofsmom and cJk (209 and 219). Goofsmom, As I posted at Cinie’s, the only label that can apply to abortion is “pro-privacy”. It’s a medical procedure and governed by HIPAA privacy regulations.
CJK, You nailed it. Sounds like you are the reincarnation of Ayn Rand. (Hope I don’t get accused of being a “right-wing infiltrate”). Rand may have provided the moral underpinnings of capitalism,but she had equal contempt for conservatives, liberals and especially collectivist “Group-Think”. I’ve started reading Rand again as an antidote to the mindless gang bangs of the political scene.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 8:47 pm
Rancho, here is the new ERA t-shirt I designed. Wanted to make the beautiful photo larger but they warned it could be distorted.
The back has more text info.
http://www.zazzle.com/era_t_shirt_suffragettes_marched_in_dc-235208232767036385
Here is the photo on the t-shirt:
http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/soc/images2/civ50.jpg
(Dances – this is old art and is being used to advance women. Shhhhhhh)
Juliette 07.11.09 at 8:51 pm
Hopepuma #158 and #183
Henry too
Spying into the private lives of these firemen who have already suffered under the initial unjust court ruling against them is just more low down dirty Chicago style politics, the kind I read and knew about early in the campaign concerning how Obama gets himself elected by any means possible. When he ran for his US Senate seat he got the private divorce papers of his opponent opened. The controversy lead his opponent to quite and the Republicans had to bring out of stater Alan Keyes in to run against O’Bully. (thats how I remember it) see July 21st edi. New Yorker Magazine “How Obama Became a Poll.”
People talk about the difference between Bush and Obama at PUMAPAC. My experience is this.
During both Bush administrations W and H Bush that is, I was fighting against many of their policies, even out on the street protesting, calling Condi Rice’s office, Sec. of Defense Rumsfeild’s and all of the dirty dealers in the Bush administration inclusing the pres. himself. My family thought I was nuts and that soon someone from the government would be charting me off to some secret detention center. Many Americans feel afraid to actively protest their govenment’s policies.
I personally never felt in dangered in anyway and knew that the fears of my family and friends were just silly.
In the Obama- “post American presidency” ( as Farid Zakaria calls it) It is no longer irrational or paranoid to be somewhat fearful of what the Obama team will do to you to shut you up or just plain get even for your desent.
During the Bush years, both W. and H., I never felt like I was viewed as the enemy. I am an American and the Bush clan in their way respected that.
Obama is quite different. From as early on as the “Joe the plummer” incident I new that this was a different America and that just being American didn’t insure you the right to even question The One.
A maximum donor for Obama who was in charge of some office in Ohio (sorry, I don’t recall the name of that gov. office) illegally leaked information from Joe T.P.’s personal files concerning child support issues. I don’t recall the woman’s name but I did contact her office to demand her resignation and tell her that she made me feel embarassed to be a democrat.
The Obama army never stopped digging for dirt on poor old Joe.
God, all the man did was ask Obama a question. And boy was Joe right about Obama’s plans being dangerous for small business owners, or hopefuls.
This is what makes Obama the most dangerous and worst thing for America. This is a Chicago insider, even worse than a Washington insider.
Obama and his thugs make me sick.
I am going to contact Sarah Palin and ask that she get behind the New Haven Fire Fighters and help stop Obama’s Stalin like tactics.
I say impeach Obama before he gets to appoint another Justice to the Supreme Court, especially since it just might be Cas Sunstien.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 8:53 pm
For the image of a woman on a horse leading the Suffragette march, this is taken from history:
1913 March
1913 – Alice Paul and Lucy Burns organized the Congressional Union that became the National Women’s Party in 1916. On March 3, 1913, they organized the march of 8000 suffragettes in DC with Inez Milholland at the front on a white horse.
This is an awesome website if any of you want to see it:
http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/soc/suffrage.html
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 9:03 pm
Since we’re all venting let me start by saying that with all of the hullaballou over a woman who is not yet even running and whose political positions are uncertain, I’ll be glad when the uber goddess Sarahissima Palin disappears to the pro-life and Republican cheering circle (as she will)in time for the 2010 elections. They’re coming up and I won’t be helping her. I understand GWB earns upwards of $100,000 per speech on the big money lecture circuit now that his term is over. Big names raise big money and the Republicans will get a lot of money out of Palin appearances. It’s a win win all around. Helping Palin to help Gingrich and Trent Lott, Phyllis Schlafly and all of the people who helped screw me for decades is not what I signed up for when I declared myself a puma and a democrat that wanted to hold the party accountable. And that is exactly what I see happening now that Palin has resigned. I simply won’t be part of the republican astroturfing machine.
Apparently, just getting this woman going no matter the cost to one’s principles is the new agenda. I still have some principles that mean a lot to me, regardless of any sense of betrayal this election cycle has made me feel. To me no party partisanship doesn’t mean no ideology, or check my beliefs at the door. Others, I’m sure, feel differently.
And speaking of The New Agenda, they have a group of women under the “big tent” who are politically paralyzed by the extremes of positions on baseline issues such as pro-choice v pro-life. When one suggests the right wingers taken up the male oppression within their own churches they decline because they really need numbers to do that but they also don’t want their religions to be criticized or even challenged. Oh well. They have a spokesperson who speaks for them and basically get nothing done.
Of course, Pumapac will say this will never happen but when one simply must remain mum on on controversial positions in order to swell the ranks and get along, well, that’s just not for me. Plenty of pumas already share Palin’s positions on choice, guns, war, environment, and whatever else, (since I don’t know the full range of what she believes).
For those pumas getting behind Palin is no stretch whatsoever. There will be no problems for them no matter what the outcome of the congressional elections and presidential elections in 2012. Some pumas won’t even care if the 2012 president selects a carbon copy of Clarence Thomas for the SC.
Can’t see my future with Palin. Sorry.
Now, where do I, a disaffected democrat fit into all of this Palin mania? Nowhere. There are plenty of candidates that I can make common cause with besides SP.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 9:04 pm
re #208 Murphy
Sometimes it strikes me as silly that we spend a lot of time worrying and fretting about whether rabid Republican fundamentalists will infiltrate our cause and bend it to their nefarious will.
~ ~ ~
I do not think it is silly to worry that non-PUMAs will infiltrate the Pumasphere blogs: I see examples everyday.
Consider the physical example: supporters of one political candidate their candidate’s poster atop that of another candidate. Or plastering their physical broadsides all over town. (I have seen this a lot in Europe’s large cities.) This is wallpapering, and the same thing happens in the Pumasphere, and it happens here at Pumapac. Commenters who fill the visual space with Very Long or Very Frequent cut/paste articles. They might or might not provide a link.
There appear to be pairs of commenters, beating the drum on every thread about the same subject, complimenting & thanking one another about posting on said topic. I do not refer to people being on the same page; I refer to people being on the same news item ad nauseum.
I realize that all this is obvious, but nonetheless, to restate the obvious –
The larger the audience for a puma blog, the more likely the attempt to infiltrate. Just common sense – why build a very large store of my own, when I can just move my merchandise into your store and benefit from your traffic?
As someone said, the democrats could have nominated a gerbil and everyone was pissed off enough to vote D. But it will be closer in 2012 (I hope). And what is the prize? All the pissed off, disenfranchised voters who are fed up with whatever party they used to believe in.
I think the astroturfing and infiltration is patently obvious.
~ ~ ~
I think we make a mistake when we assume too quickly that someone is too far left or right for us to work together with.
For me there really are people that are too far right to work with. I will not give my energy to people whose larger agenda includes outcomes that are diametrically opposed to my own personal interests. Absolutely not, and why should I, when there are lots of other groups of disenfranchised people who share my values and my agenda?
#223 BigCatLover
bottom line is that you must form coalitions in order to win power and achieve your goals as a group
Agree, but only to the point where coalitions do share some agendas or goals, and do not find abhorrent those goals that are not shared.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 9:06 pm
BillieJo
Your t-shirts are beautiful!!
I’ve made one or two ERA, and slogan t-shirts for the store on cafepress… but want to change the name of it before posting the link.
I had to redo most of the designs I uploaded that had images… due to copyright infringement. So I started all over again. Mine are just text right now… when I find the time, I’ll redo with images.
Meanwhile, again, your t-shirts are beeeeeyooooootiiiiiiful!
back to painting.
DeadGirl 07.11.09 at 9:09 pm
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 2:19 am
“Confession – when I saw the copy of the Bill of Rights in DC, I cried. That’s my religion.”
I am right there with you on that one Sister!
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 9:14 pm
MKfromLA
#223 BigCatLover
bottom line is that you must form coalitions in order to win power and achieve your goals as a group
Agree, but only to the point where coalitions do share some agendas or goals, and do not find abhorrent those goals that are not shared.
************************************
Yes, that’s what I said.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 9:15 pm
urphy,
Phyllis Schalfly is an ASSHOLE and a BIGOT and a nasty lying person. But whatever work or struggle or change we are able to achieve to improve the power and freedom of women is work we are doing for HER too. Whether she likes it or not. Whether she wants it or not. Whether she hates us or not.
_____________________________
No, Murphy, Phyllis is not just an asshole and a bigot, etc. She is the leader of a well funded organization with deep and extensive connections to other organizations that are run by people who not only deny women’s equality but espouse a whole host of ideas that are anathema to the very concepts of freedom and equality. You embrace her she sucks you dry, throws stumbling blocks in YOUR way, wastes YOUR time, learns YOUR plans in advance.
There is something called strategy when building toward one’s aims, forming alliances should be strategic not idealistic. How in the world will lesbians and feminists proceed in the political arena giving veto power over their agenda to women who represent the interests of their enemies?
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 9:16 pm
Ms Uppity has a great photo of Baracko dressed up as the POPE on it:
http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 9:17 pm
#267 tsunami
New York Post.
Pravda on the Hudson isn’t ready for this.
WSJ is on it.
~~~
thank you for correcting me on NYTimes vs NYPost. I misspoke.
However, I personally find it polarizing to say “pravda on the hudson”. I hold no stock in the NYT, but I do have an investment in informed discourse and debate.
Polarizing statements don’t persuade (well, they don’t persuade me). They just annoy.
I do not mean this to be personal (I really hate that) … I have just decided to speak my mind, or not speak at all.
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 9:19 pm
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 9:03 pm
Since we’re all venting let me start by saying that with all of the hullaballou over a woman who is not yet even running and whose political positions are uncertain, I’ll be glad when the uber goddess Sarahissima Palin disappears to the pro-life and Republican cheering circle (as she will)in time for the 2010 elections. They’re coming up and I won’t be helping her. I understand GWB earns upwards of $100,000 per speech on the big money lecture circuit now that his term is over. Big names raise big money and the Republicans will get a lot of money out of Palin appearances. It’s a win win all around. Helping Palin to help Gingrich and Trent Lott, Phyllis Schlafly and all of the people who helped screw me for decades is not what I signed up for when I declared myself a puma and a democrat that wanted to hold the party accountable. And that is exactly what I see happening now that Palin has resigned. I simply won’t be part of the republican astroturfing machine.
************************************
If this happens, I’m with you 100% and I believe other pumas are too. I think you misunderstand and over estimate the excitement for the possibilities that Palin might achieve with Sarah worship.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 9:19 pm
BCL #267
Yes, that’s what I said.
~~~
Thanks. My fur was getting very ruffled. Thanks for correcting me.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 9:21 pm
#275 Deadgirl
Oh so glad I am not alone on this!
sniff
BigCatLover 07.11.09 at 9:22 pm
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 9:16 pm
Ms Uppity has a great photo of Baracko dressed up as the POPE on it:
http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/
**************************************
The woman on the cover of that magazine looks just like a boss I used to have. It’s freaking me out.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 9:23 pm
Murphy,additional to my #277,
Don’t worry, Phyllis won’t hate you. She will agree that it will be a good idea for all of us to work toward a more perfect union.
BillieJo 07.11.09 at 9:24 pm
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 9:06 pm
BillieJo
Your t-shirts are beautiful!!
I’ve made one or two ERA, and slogan t-shirts for the store on cafepress… but want to change the name of it before posting the link.
I had to redo most of the designs I uploaded that had images… due to copyright infringement. So I started all over again. Mine are just text right now… when I find the time, I’ll redo with images.
Meanwhile, again, your t-shirts are beeeeeyooooootiiiiiiful!
back to painting.
———-
Thanks Dances, I really want to see yours.
I wanted to make the photo the real center piece but was afraid it would be too pixilated. Darn!
I have to make some good ERA buttons, bought the two I made and they were okay but not fantastic. Someone else bought 10 of them so I hope they are okay.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 9:28 pm
AniEm #268
The Frankford-Fishing vote sounds very tempting, but I don’t think I have the stomach for public office.
I was offered a position as an appointed committee person by a women who worked very hard on HRC campaign, as most public officials in my district did. I had to turn it down and told her that I just could not work anymore for a party that had Barak Obama as it’s leader. She understood.
I think what is more important right now, especially since our elected representatives seem to becoming irrelevant and their authority is soon to be usurped by czars, is that private citizens must be urged to pay attention and become active in demanding that their democracy and rights be preserved.
“Educate and Inform the whole mass of the people; they are the only sure reliance of our preservation of liberty.”
Thomas Jefferson
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 9:31 pm
BCL #280.
I hope you’re right.
AniEm 07.11.09 at 9:56 pm
Juliette,
Good for you. I’m glad to hear these little stories of triumph and resistance, given all-out Obamania. It’s interesting to know that your political co-worker “understood”. There’s an undertone that, if you don’t support Obama, you’ll be sent to the gulag or something. Very creepy. Some kind of trespass occurred in the Joe-the-Plumber scenario that violated everyone’s civil rights. I love the Jefferson quote but I’m definitely guilty of being undereducated politically and am trying to read more to catch up. Blogs like this are a god-send to me.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 10:23 pm
re #243 Murphy on Schlafley & feminism
Murphy, you use the word woman and feminist as if they are interchangeable.
…..I wont in theory or practice exclude her (Schlafley) from the circle of women.
…..But YOU Cinie are excluded by women who deny womanhood to lesbians or deny womanhood to those without children
The first statement refers to feminists who disagree that Schlafley is a FEMINIST – The first statement does not refer to feminists who state that Schlafley is not a women.
The second statement refers to women who agree that lesbians or non-mothers are WOMEN.
The two statements are not the same. The hurtfulness of the two statements are not equivalent. The definition of WOMAN and FEMINIST are not the same, and the above indirect phrasing is really just an attempt to make the 2 words appear to mean the same.
FEMINISTS who are also lesbians and/or non-child-bearing women would never deny the womanhood of Phyllis Schlafely.
Who would ever in their right mind deny that a lesbian is a woman? Only people whose definition of woman is based on her social or biological relationship to a man.
Those people are ANTI-FEMINISTS.
MKfromLA 07.11.09 at 10:25 pm
correction ….
The second statement refers to women who agree that lesbians or non-mothers are NOT WOMEN.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 10:29 pm
Republicans use the pro-life red button issue to get votes, just like Obama used his faux anti-war position to get votes.
Remember how G. W. Bush left his pro-life supporters literally out in the cold at a rally which he snubbed.
Sarah Palin appointed a PRO-CHOICE judge to Alaskas supreme court while under much pressure from the right to do otherwise. Sorry for the caps but some people are still trying so hard to ignore that fact.
I hope that if she runs for president she will as an independent. However if she does lend her star power to republicans running in the 2010 I would have to say that having more balanced representation in Congress could only help this country. The democrats are drunk with power and it is a disgrace how they are using it.
I said this before, that republicans and democrats are kind of like good and bad bacteria in your body. If there is a proper balance they will stay busy fighting each other with little energy left to fight us. Right now the democratic bacteria in congress w/Obama are expanding the power of the FED, attempting to limit our free speech. They our firing Inspectors General and seek to make 5 different I.G. positions in financial regulatory commissions an appointment position by Obama!
They are pushing a Crap and Trade bill and a farse of a Health Care bill. They are stealing our money and funneling it into ACORN’s new international network- Community Orginizers International. What a malignancy!
The list goes on and on and the corruption is to fast and furious to even keep up with. The only voice I hear amoung the democrats in contension of this political power grab is from Dennis Kucinich.
I loved Camille Paglia’s quote concerning Palin’s common sense.
“The first stimulous was a total farce, so let’s double down on dept. How many Ivytards does it take to figure out what Sarah Palin already knows through common sense?”
They are no Sarah Palin worshipors here.
I can promise you I won’t be assembling a choir of brainwashed children to sing praises to Sarah Palin like those scary children of the Corn in the Singing for Obama video.
I think alot of us see something refreshing and new in Sarah Plain. She had great sucess as Governor of AL in the short time that she was able to do her job without the wrath of Obamabots making her and her families life a living hell while costing AL millions of dollars.
Obama politics must be defeated sonner and not later. If Sarah Palin can help equalize the power between Rep. and Dems in govenment-great. If she decides to go out on her own as an Independent, better still.
Don’t forget how Nancy, Reid and Emanuel pushed through Buch’s Banker’s Bailout. If there wasn’t some kind of dirty deal made between the dems and the Bush administration they sure made it look that way.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 10:32 pm
A few of Schlafly’s governmental agenda items from the Eagle Forum 2005 position statement
Phyllis on gawd.
Congress should pass a law providing that federal judges have no power to ban the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten Commandments, and other public acknowledgments of God by public officials or on public property. Rep. Todd Akin’s (R-MO) bill to protect the Pledge of Allegiance passed the House in the fall of 2004, but the Senate took no action, so it must be reintroduced and passed again in 2005. We also support Rep. Robert Aderholt’s (R-AL) bill to protect the Ten Commandments from federal judges.
Phyllis on Title IX
Title IX. The Bush Administration and Congress should fix the injustices caused by the feminist-enforced Title IX quotas, which specify that the proportion of men to women who participate in competitive sports cannot exceed their proportional enrollment in college. This quota system (not created by the law, but by Carter and Clinton feminists) has caused the senseless elimination of hundreds of men’s college teams (such as 171 wrestling teams), and unless Bush or Congress takes action to stop this nonsense, high school sports are next on the feminists’ hit list.
In his first Administration, President Bush appointed a commission to deal with the Title IX injustices, but he foolishly put feminists on it, and that mistake prevented any action to remedy the problem. Now, the Bush Justice Department is before the Supreme Court trying to get activist judges to expand the mischief of Title IX by creating a new cause of action to allow lawsuits to be filed against high schools.
Phyllis on science instruction in schools
National Science Tests. Eagle Forum supports repealing the language of the No Child Left Behind Act which mandates science standards beginning in 2005-2006, and science testing beginning in 2007-2008 for grades 3 through 5, grades 6 through 9, and grades 10 through 12. The science testing requirement, which was inserted into the law at the very end of conference negotiations without debate, opens the door for national test standards to enforce the teaching of evolution. The version that passed the House did not include this requirement, and most Congressmen believed that the law would require testing only for reading and math. The Daschle-Kennedy Senate inserted the harmful science testing provision, which could compel new evolution indoctrination for eight-year-olds nationwide.
http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2005/jan05/psrjan05.html
Let’s everybody give a warm welcome to the housewife from Alton Ill.
DancesWithPumas 07.11.09 at 10:39 pm
Let’s everybody give a warm welcome to the housewife from Alton Ill.
————–
LOL!!
Juliette 07.11.09 at 10:49 pm
AniEm #288
Yes Aniem, nearly all of the democratic committee people in my district were horified at the thought of Obama being our president. At that time most of them believed that McCain would win as did I. Then came the orchestrated Banking collaspe in late September, only eight weeks before the election. McCain was blind sided by the Bush administrations- Pelosi, Reid and Emanuel cartel. The far right hated McCain so much I am convinced that they conspired with Pelosi, Reid and Emanuel to knock him out eight weeks before the elecion. Notice how an administration hell bent on holding Bush and Cheney accountable for war crimes, has folded again and again on that crusade.
I think PUMAPAC is a great place to stay informd of political policies.
You can also sign-u for Megavote and get email alerts about every bill being brought up for vote by Congress.
http://www.politicsol.com/megavote/2007-06-25.html
see subscribe now top right of banner
Cinie 07.11.09 at 10:50 pm
The Weekly Standard is a neoconservative, pro-Palin site, Juliette, and they disagree with you.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 11:00 pm
I read an article with an opposing view Cinie. I’ll try to find it for you.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 11:13 pm
Sorry Cinie
Too much junk on Google for me to find that article.
Persephone had posted a ink to it a while back.
In any case I do know that Palin’s pernal beliefs are pro-life. So are McCains, but they both have a refreshing view on Supreme court appoinmnets, and that is that they should be competent and up hold the constitution of the US.
Remember that McCain dispite his por-life views did not oppose in any way the appointments of Supreme Curt Justices Ginsberg and Breyer.
By the way JimmyCarter was on the same page as Palin and McCain on this issue. He said he could “live with” Roe v. Wade.
Juliette 07.11.09 at 11:18 pm
“por-life views.” Oh God, to many typos to correct.
As Persephone’s grandmother would say- “Its time to get out of the computer.”
PumaRhythm 07.11.09 at 11:19 pm
Thank You
Murphy!
For Giving Us A Home..
here at pumapac.
PumaRhythm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tambako/494116728/sizes/l/in/set-72157600220349219/
Goodnight PumaNation.
admin 07.11.09 at 11:23 pm
MK said, “re #243 Murphy on Schlafley & feminism
Murphy, you use the word woman and feminist as if they are interchangeable.”
That’s right, MK, I do.
PUMAbear 07.11.09 at 11:25 pm
going dog walking bbl
Headclunker 07.11.09 at 11:45 pm
I have run across some very unpleasant Obots, on the attack of Mayara Tavares. Everything from claims that BO was oogling because she was barefoot to hyping the video, claiming he was looking at the woman behind them. Some claim she is 17 instead of 16 and the obots are hyping. I found most websites posting her picture without the video being blocked as “attack” sites.
Bad News. Google Mayara Tavares.
PumaRhythm 07.12.09 at 12:34 am
Regarding my post #299 PumaRhythm…
I’m am so sorry I forgot to give attribution to the artist..
Photo by Tambako the Jaguar:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tambako/494116728/sizes/l/in/set-72157600220349219/
a beautiful photo!
G’Night Pumas
BillieJo 07.12.09 at 12:47 am
Juliette 07.11.09 at 10:49 pm
nearly all of the democratic committee people in my district were horified at the thought of Obama being our president. At that time most of them believed that McCain would win as did I. Then came the orchestrated Banking collaspe in late September, only eight weeks before the election. McCain was blind sided by the Bush administrations- Pelosi, Reid and Emanuel cartel.
————-
I gotta put my tinfoil hat on for this comment, but I have always felt that the economy going into the dumper all of a sudden before the end of the election was partly manipulated by obots on wall street. I know they didn’t have total control over the economy, but when all the MSM said the Jackass staying out of DC and continuing the campaign speeches was showing that he knew the most about the way to run the country…it sounded like such bs…then every time McCain gained a point up, the stock market would tank again.
murphy 07.12.09 at 12:47 am
hi there PumaRhythm, great photo!
Infiltrators posted,
take it upstairs!
You must log in to post a comment.