<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Michael Jackson Learned to Dance:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/</link>
	<description>People United Means Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: airforcehusker</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250747</link>
		<dc:creator>airforcehusker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250747</guid>
		<description>Who is kempion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is kempion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: airforcehusker</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250745</link>
		<dc:creator>airforcehusker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250745</guid>
		<description>No that must of been someone else. I currently work a job in which i must complete a background check every 5 years. I can assure you this much about the clearances, 1) You must be able to account for every waking day of your life during the screening, In other words you will show every area you lived and where you came from and be able to provide names and numbers of people who knew you. This is from birth until present. Also any questionable activities, alias, as well as people questionable to government must be identified. I can assure you with him even with this spead up it would take years to get a clearance. On an average with all paperwork, names, number etc completed it takes about 1 to 1 1/2 years to get a clearance completed. Hope that helps answe questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No that must of been someone else. I currently work a job in which i must complete a background check every 5 years. I can assure you this much about the clearances, 1) You must be able to account for every waking day of your life during the screening, In other words you will show every area you lived and where you came from and be able to provide names and numbers of people who knew you. This is from birth until present. Also any questionable activities, alias, as well as people questionable to government must be identified. I can assure you with him even with this spead up it would take years to get a clearance. On an average with all paperwork, names, number etc completed it takes about 1 to 1 1/2 years to get a clearance completed. Hope that helps answe questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250743</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250743</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; SHOUT OUT TO THE COMPLAINERS!!!
SouthernGAL68
mkp65
murphy
Sunshinelvr
bluelady
tec
webfoot
gojoyknocks
Patty
WBD
CasperCat
Headclunker
Mbet
BarbNoBo
PaDem
Stoney42
DragonFly
DancesWithPumas
&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> SHOUT OUT TO THE COMPLAINERS!!!<br />
SouthernGAL68<br />
mkp65<br />
murphy<br />
Sunshinelvr<br />
bluelady<br />
tec<br />
webfoot<br />
gojoyknocks<br />
Patty<br />
WBD<br />
CasperCat<br />
Headclunker<br />
Mbet<br />
BarbNoBo<br />
PaDem<br />
Stoney42<br />
DragonFly<br />
DancesWithPumas<br />
</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphy</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250742</link>
		<dc:creator>murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250742</guid>
		<description>cat trap posted. (dont mistake it for agreeing with Kempion. bye kempion.)

take it upstairs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cat trap posted. (dont mistake it for agreeing with Kempion. bye kempion.)</p>
<p>take it upstairs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancesWithPumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250741</link>
		<dc:creator>DancesWithPumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250741</guid>
		<description>Yo Kempion 
Same ol&#039; stale Kempion. 
Go fuck your condenscending self.

and a pleasant good morning to Pumas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Kempion<br />
Same ol&#8217; stale Kempion.<br />
Go fuck your condenscending self.</p>
<p>and a pleasant good morning to Pumas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasTigress</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250740</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasTigress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250740</guid>
		<description>airforce - I think I read that you mentioned on a previous post that the FBI vetts or does background checks on candidates and that is incorrect .
 A long time ago , when some of us were working on the voter fraud issue we contacted the FBI and were told that there is no background check required for people running for office . I had always assumed it was automatic , but it is not .. Scary , huh ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>airforce &#8211; I think I read that you mentioned on a previous post that the FBI vetts or does background checks on candidates and that is incorrect .<br />
 A long time ago , when some of us were working on the voter fraud issue we contacted the FBI and were told that there is no background check required for people running for office . I had always assumed it was automatic , but it is not .. Scary , huh ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKfromLA</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250739</link>
		<dc:creator>MKfromLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250739</guid>
		<description>Big big thank you to all you great PUMA FECK Complainers!  WOMEN WHO SMOKE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big big thank you to all you great PUMA FECK Complainers!  WOMEN WHO SMOKE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: airforcehusker</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250738</link>
		<dc:creator>airforcehusker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250738</guid>
		<description>GoPumaGo,
You will see in a previous post on this board i am at a war of words with others on a message board i frequent. It amazes me how angry oboma supporters are about this issue. Look it was okay to question mccain but not their messiah. The whole thing is very troubling and i still cannot believe people will accept anything or everything this guy says becuase it is from oboma. Its a total joke and worse off we could be looking at the largest conspiracy in the history of this country. 
I can help but think to he all of this for what? A lier who shouldnt even be in this position to start with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoPumaGo,<br />
You will see in a previous post on this board i am at a war of words with others on a message board i frequent. It amazes me how angry oboma supporters are about this issue. Look it was okay to question mccain but not their messiah. The whole thing is very troubling and i still cannot believe people will accept anything or everything this guy says becuase it is from oboma. Its a total joke and worse off we could be looking at the largest conspiracy in the history of this country.<br />
I can help but think to he all of this for what? A lier who shouldnt even be in this position to start with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjv</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250737</link>
		<dc:creator>cjv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250737</guid>
		<description>Kempion

In HRC for SOS, I don&#039;t find myself supporting this appointment. I was hoping that she would have remained as US Senator for NY. Yet, I am also not ready to state that she betrayed us. There just isn&#039;t enough information but there may have been a betrayal towards her form the rest of the senate and from those who are in New Yok State. For starters, I can&#039;t help to think that Schumer has done much to damage her as I am aware that they did not seem to get along.

I am going to wait before I feel I have an established opinion in hopes that more information eventually comes about as to why negotiating for SOS was to be a benefit for her and her supporters rather than remaining in the Senate. Just the same, it is a loss for the New York State constituents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kempion</p>
<p>In HRC for SOS, I don&#8217;t find myself supporting this appointment. I was hoping that she would have remained as US Senator for NY. Yet, I am also not ready to state that she betrayed us. There just isn&#8217;t enough information but there may have been a betrayal towards her form the rest of the senate and from those who are in New Yok State. For starters, I can&#8217;t help to think that Schumer has done much to damage her as I am aware that they did not seem to get along.</p>
<p>I am going to wait before I feel I have an established opinion in hopes that more information eventually comes about as to why negotiating for SOS was to be a benefit for her and her supporters rather than remaining in the Senate. Just the same, it is a loss for the New York State constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoPumaGo</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/30/how-michael-jackson-learned-to-dance/comment-page-2/#comment-250736</link>
		<dc:creator>GoPumaGo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=3198#comment-250736</guid>
		<description>December 1st today.  At the Supreme Court Berg is suppose to maybe receive some answers from Obama.  For this we waited about an entire month.  Obama&#039;s lawyers will say nothing and we wasted precious time.  I am not sure on the details of today.  It is not a full trial but I think Obama&#039;s lawyers were to be given some time to come up with some answers.  not sure of the questions.  I foget now.  Anyway,  hopefully we will hear something by tonight on what takes place.  

Then later on Friday the SC will have a discussion on whether to look into the Donofrio case.  I personally like the Donofrio case.  The Berg case is also good but the Donofrio case gets right to the critical question immediately without the need for Birth Certificates.  

I hope that the SC will have the courage to tackle this Constitutional question directly and not avoid it.  This one is just too important.  Sometimes the SC will combine cases and hear oral arguments at the same time.  In this case that might be reasonable.  I would think they would like to hear both Berg and Donofrio before making such an important decision.  

However, if I were a SC judge I would simply come down in favor of Donofrio immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>December 1st today.  At the Supreme Court Berg is suppose to maybe receive some answers from Obama.  For this we waited about an entire month.  Obama&#8217;s lawyers will say nothing and we wasted precious time.  I am not sure on the details of today.  It is not a full trial but I think Obama&#8217;s lawyers were to be given some time to come up with some answers.  not sure of the questions.  I foget now.  Anyway,  hopefully we will hear something by tonight on what takes place.  </p>
<p>Then later on Friday the SC will have a discussion on whether to look into the Donofrio case.  I personally like the Donofrio case.  The Berg case is also good but the Donofrio case gets right to the critical question immediately without the need for Birth Certificates.  </p>
<p>I hope that the SC will have the courage to tackle this Constitutional question directly and not avoid it.  This one is just too important.  Sometimes the SC will combine cases and hear oral arguments at the same time.  In this case that might be reasonable.  I would think they would like to hear both Berg and Donofrio before making such an important decision.  </p>
<p>However, if I were a SC judge I would simply come down in favor of Donofrio immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
