<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeless Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/</link>
	<description>People United Means Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Debra in Midwest</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-237024</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra in Midwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-237024</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll start by saying I&#039;m glad this site exists.  I truly believe that our country only benefits by more people becoming interested, involved and invested in our political process.  I say this although I vehemently disagree with the ideology of this site.  Usually I just read what&#039;s posted and it certainly is food for thought.  What troubles me is that I can&#039;t shake the feeling that you hate me...and others like me.  In decrying how you felt dehumanized during this campaign, you dehumanize me..by calling me and others like me names like &quot;Obots&quot;.  In speaking out justifiably against sexism, you minimize the influence of racism...referring to it simply as a &quot;card&quot; to be played.  Completely ignoring the fact that those who discriminate against blacks are often those who also discriminate against women.  I guess it leaves me wondering if there is any common cause between us?  Is our joint opposition to discrimination in any form and our quest to find our political voice enough to overcome our disagreement over who should be President?  Or does that disagreement trump everything?  Is there a possibility for rapproachment or is your rejection of me and those like me total and complete?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll start by saying I&#8217;m glad this site exists.  I truly believe that our country only benefits by more people becoming interested, involved and invested in our political process.  I say this although I vehemently disagree with the ideology of this site.  Usually I just read what&#8217;s posted and it certainly is food for thought.  What troubles me is that I can&#8217;t shake the feeling that you hate me&#8230;and others like me.  In decrying how you felt dehumanized during this campaign, you dehumanize me..by calling me and others like me names like &#8220;Obots&#8221;.  In speaking out justifiably against sexism, you minimize the influence of racism&#8230;referring to it simply as a &#8220;card&#8221; to be played.  Completely ignoring the fact that those who discriminate against blacks are often those who also discriminate against women.  I guess it leaves me wondering if there is any common cause between us?  Is our joint opposition to discrimination in any form and our quest to find our political voice enough to overcome our disagreement over who should be President?  Or does that disagreement trump everything?  Is there a possibility for rapproachment or is your rejection of me and those like me total and complete?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catsarepumas</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236944</link>
		<dc:creator>catsarepumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236944</guid>
		<description>I posted the Rahm Emanuel video on my new word press blog.  Thank you to those that linked to it and spread the word about making it viral.  
Comments are welcome if anyone wants to take a look. 

catsden.wordpress.com

I am not trying to take traffic away from our home here; just looking for input from fellow PUMAs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the Rahm Emanuel video on my new word press blog.  Thank you to those that linked to it and spread the word about making it viral.<br />
Comments are welcome if anyone wants to take a look. </p>
<p>catsden.wordpress.com</p>
<p>I am not trying to take traffic away from our home here; just looking for input from fellow PUMAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mylifeontheglist</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236904</link>
		<dc:creator>mylifeontheglist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236904</guid>
		<description>woodie, the only cable news I watch is FOXnews (it&#039;s the most balanced), I am boycotting the rest.  Here&#039;s my letter to Newsweek:

http://mylifeontheglist.com/2008/11/10/my-letter-to-newsweek-not-with-my-money/

Murphy, what are our action plans about boycotting MSM.  Surely we need to let them know who own them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woodie, the only cable news I watch is FOXnews (it&#8217;s the most balanced), I am boycotting the rest.  Here&#8217;s my letter to Newsweek:</p>
<p><a href="http://mylifeontheglist.com/2008/11/10/my-letter-to-newsweek-not-with-my-money/" rel="nofollow">http://mylifeontheglist.com/2008/11/10/my-letter-to-newsweek-not-with-my-money/</a></p>
<p>Murphy, what are our action plans about boycotting MSM.  Surely we need to let them know who own them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodie</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236862</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236862</guid>
		<description>Boycott,,i’m not watching CNN, MSNBC, ABC CBS, FOX all of them can go to hell!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycott,,i’m not watching CNN, MSNBC, ABC CBS, FOX all of them can go to hell!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gojoyknocks</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236839</link>
		<dc:creator>gojoyknocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236839</guid>
		<description>$20.00 for mama coming snail mail. For flowers or organic fruit basket. Get well soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$20.00 for mama coming snail mail. For flowers or organic fruit basket. Get well soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slyt2</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236837</link>
		<dc:creator>slyt2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236837</guid>
		<description>I just got back on WHAT&#039;S WRONG WITH MAMA (haven&#039;t gotten through all the post started bottom to top) she is in the hospital???????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back on WHAT&#8217;S WRONG WITH MAMA (haven&#8217;t gotten through all the post started bottom to top) she is in the hospital???????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodie</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236829</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236829</guid>
		<description>This country&#039;s economy would not have been so robust if it was not for all the women who were inspired by women&#039;s lib to go to work as well as
raise their families!!!  That was 30 yrs. ago.....
And quite frankly, Palin should have told them this.  Hey you guys the media need to can it, you know why, because us women fight in wars right along side the men, therefore we should have equal rights and certainly more respect than what you are showing me right now....that&#039;s what she should have told them.   Those SOBs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This country&#8217;s economy would not have been so robust if it was not for all the women who were inspired by women&#8217;s lib to go to work as well as<br />
raise their families!!!  That was 30 yrs. ago&#8230;..<br />
And quite frankly, Palin should have told them this.  Hey you guys the media need to can it, you know why, because us women fight in wars right along side the men, therefore we should have equal rights and certainly more respect than what you are showing me right now&#8230;.that&#8217;s what she should have told them.   Those SOBs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewOrleansPuma</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236824</link>
		<dc:creator>NewOrleansPuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236824</guid>
		<description>Kat in hat: And I should also add not just every religion on the face of the earth but every culture prior to the modern era and I mark that era for the purposes of this issue: the early twentieth century and the appearance of Marx and some of the first materiallistic existentialist philosophers. who bodied out in other disciplines his exorcism of a spiritual dimension regarding the human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat in hat: And I should also add not just every religion on the face of the earth but every culture prior to the modern era and I mark that era for the purposes of this issue: the early twentieth century and the appearance of Marx and some of the first materiallistic existentialist philosophers. who bodied out in other disciplines his exorcism of a spiritual dimension regarding the human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellecat</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236822</link>
		<dc:creator>bellecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236822</guid>
		<description>Hello Murphy:
As always, great artwork above and great posting.
To all those involved in the Prowl/Action: Who has standing?
*Thank you so much*. 
I will be making it my personal goal to spread this around; though I have a very tight work deadline for the 21st, I&#039;ll be catching up when I can.
PUMA LUV and HUGS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Murphy:<br />
As always, great artwork above and great posting.<br />
To all those involved in the Prowl/Action: Who has standing?<br />
*Thank you so much*.<br />
I will be making it my personal goal to spread this around; though I have a very tight work deadline for the 21st, I&#8217;ll be catching up when I can.<br />
PUMA LUV and HUGS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama</title>
		<link>http://pumapac.org/2008/11/12/homeless-women/comment-page-3/#comment-236821</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pumapac.org/?p=2749#comment-236821</guid>
		<description>BrianH 11.12.08 at 4:53 pm
It happens that the injecting matching capital and selling the ownership shares later is the model which has worked here and elsewhere in the past. It gets much more bang for the buck, and does not sideline the banks, which, after all, will be the continuing base for lending in the future. Most top economists much preferred this approach from the get-go.
==================

How does this compare with the approach Bill Clinton&#039;s Treasury used with their successful bailouts of Mexico and some Asian situations in the 90s? (The Mexico thing ended up making a profit for the US.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BrianH 11.12.08 at 4:53 pm<br />
It happens that the injecting matching capital and selling the ownership shares later is the model which has worked here and elsewhere in the past. It gets much more bang for the buck, and does not sideline the banks, which, after all, will be the continuing base for lending in the future. Most top economists much preferred this approach from the get-go.<br />
==================</p>
<p>How does this compare with the approach Bill Clinton&#8217;s Treasury used with their successful bailouts of Mexico and some Asian situations in the 90s? (The Mexico thing ended up making a profit for the US.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
